Observational studyInfection2025
Anidulafungin exposure and population pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients with invasive candidiasis.
Observational study in Infection, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04045366 (Impact of Capillary Leak and Hypoalbuminemia on PK/PD of Anidulafungin and Caspofungin in Critically Ill Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Impact of Capillary Leak and Hypoalbuminemia on PK/PD of Anidulafungin and Caspofungin in Critically Ill Patients
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rezafungin Versus Caspofungin for the Treatment of Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: Results from the Double-blind, Randomized, Phase 3 ReSTORE Trial Including the China Extension Study.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Trial
- FKS1/2-variant independent mechanisms underlying the emergence of resistance in echinocandin-refractory Candida auris infections.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Invasive Candidiasis in Critically Ill Patients: Fundamental Concepts and Future Directions.Chest · 2026Review
- Article
- Rezafungin: an opportunity to personalize the treatment of patients with candidemia.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAnidulafungin is recommended as a first-line treatment for invasive Candida infections in critically ill patients. Pharmacokinetic (PK) variability is large in critically ill patients, potentially compromising pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) target attainment under standard dosing. We aimed to assess anidulafungin exposure, PKPD target attainment, and population (pop)PK in critically ill patients.
methodsAdult ICU patients receiving standard anidulafungin dosing [200 mg on day 1, then 100 mg daily] were included (NCT04045366). We performed rich blood sampling on an early (day 2 ± 1) and/or late (day 5 ± 1) treatment day. Using total anidulafungin plasma concentrations, we developed a popPK model (NONMEM7.5) and conducted Monte Carlo simulations (n = 1,000 per virtual patient) to evaluate the impact of patient factors on PKPD target attainment (AUC
resultsTwenty patients contributed 188 anidulafungin concentrations. PKPD target attainment was 45% and 65% on early and late sampling days, respectively. A two-compartment popPK model with first-order elimination described the data. Anidulafungin clearance increased with bodyweight and central volume of distribution increased as serum albumin decreased. Both bodyweight and serum albumin had a clinically relevant impact on PKPD target attainment at day 1 (area under the ROC curve; AUROC 0.82 and 0.62, respectively), and bodyweight on PKPD target attainment at day 14 (AUROC 0.94). Standard anidulafungin dosing regimen fails to achieve adequate target attainment throughout the treatment period.
conclusionStandard anidulafungin dosing is insufficient for achieving adequate exposure in critically ill patients. An interactive simulation tool is provided to aid dose-finding research and explore different dosing strategies and targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39641856What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.