ArticleNeurochemical research2024
Exploring New and Promising Genetic Biomarkers for Evaluating Traumatic Brain Injuries: A Case-Control Study.
Article in Neurochemical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Potential Correlation Between Molecular Biomarkers and Oxidative Stress in Traumatic Brain Injury.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a common cause of morbidity and death in all age groups, with an estimated 50 million people having brain injury due to trauma each year. Accurate blood-based biomarkers are needed to assist with diagnosis of patients across the spectrum of time and severity. Our objectives were to explore the diagnostic precision of time- and severity- related four blood-based biomarkers: AKT3, GSK-3β, hsa-miR-16-5p, and MALAT-1 for TBI for the purpose of diagnosis, prognosis, and follow-up. 40 samples were recruited as the following: 30 TBI patients and 10 healthy volunteers as controls with matched age and sex. They were divided according to the Glasgow Coma Scale into mild (mTBI), moderate (modTBI), and severe(sTBI) TBI. Blood samples were withdrawn at entry, and after 5 and 30 days, RT-PCR was used for measuring the expression level. The results showed upregulated expression levels of AKT3, hsa-miR-16-5p and significantly downregulated expression levels of GSK-3β in TBI patients compared to controls at all timings measured. mTBI patients showed a higher expression level of hsa-miR-16-5p compared with modTBI, and sTBI patients. MALAT-1 level showed a significant increase in severe cases only. We concluded that AKT3, hsa-miR-16-5p, and GSK-3β are excellent diagnostic biomarkers in TBI patients at initial assessment, as well as at 5 and 30 days following the injury. Moreover, MALAT-1 had good diagnostic value in sTBI patients, and its prognostic value extends to 30 days. GSK-3β was an excellent biomarker for detecting mTBI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.