Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39641802›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2025

Letter to the editor concerning "Erector Spinae could be the game changer in surgical decision-making in patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis: a cross-sectional analysis of an age-, sex-, subtype-, level-matched patients with similar spinopelvic parameters received surgical or conservative management" by M.S. Eksi, et al. (Eur Spine J [2024]: doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08341-3).

Weijing Fang, Zhan Wang

Abstract readLetter
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Weijing FangDepartment of Burns & Wound Care Centre, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Zhan WangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China. wangzhanhz@zju.edu.cn.

Funding

Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation LQ22H250002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The letter responds to a study on the role of erector spinae muscle quality in surgical decision-making for lumbar spondylolisthesis. It highlights the potential of paraspinal muscle fatty infiltration as a predictive factor, suggesting that early rehabilitation targeting these muscles may reduce the need for surgery. The authors propose improvements for future research, such as using advanced MRI techniques for better fat infiltration assessment, controlling patient activity levels, and incorporating multidimensional imaging analyses with machine learning. These advancements could support more personalized treatment strategies for lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingLumbar VertebraeParaspinal MusclesSpondylolisthesisCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMale

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.