Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39641581›Full record

ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2025

Validation of the Language ENvironment Analysis (LENA) Automated Speech Processing Algorithm Labels for Adult and Child Segments in a Sample of Families From India.

Shoba S Meera, Divya Swaminathan, Sri Ranjani Venkata Murali, Reny Raju, Malavi Srikar, Sahana Shyam Sundar, Senthil Amudhan, Alejandrina Cristia, Rahul Pawar, Achuth Rao and 3 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Shoba S MeeraDepartment of Speech Pathology and Audiology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8867-9457
Divya SwaminathanDepartment of Speech Pathology and Audiology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India.ORCID 0000-0001-9686-0790
Sri Ranjani Venkata MuraliSri Ramachandra Faculty of Audiology and Speech Language Pathology, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, India.ORCID 0000-0002-7982-6205
Reny RajuDepartment of Speech Pathology and Audiology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India.ORCID 0000-0003-1905-4845
Malavi SrikarDepartment of Speech Pathology and Audiology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8928-6516
Sahana Shyam SundarDepartment of Speech Pathology and Audiology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India.
Senthil AmudhanDepartment of Epidemiology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8361-9623
Alejandrina CristiaLaboratoire de Sciences Cognitives et Psycholinguistique, Département d'études cognitives, ENS, EHESS, CNRS, PSL University, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2979-4556
Rahul PawarBanva, Mumbai, India.
Achuth RaoIndian Institute of Science, Bangalore.
Prathyusha P VasukiDepartment of Biostatistics, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India.
Shree VolmeDepartment of Speech Pathology and Audiology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India.
Ashok MysoreSt. John's National Academy of Health Sciences, Bangalore, India.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe Language ENvironment Analysis (LENA) technology uses automated speech processing (ASP) algorithms to estimate counts such as total adult words and child vocalizations, which helps understand children's early language environment. This ASP has been validated in North American English and other languages in predominantly monolingual contexts but not in a multilingual context like India. Thus, the current study aims to validate the classification accuracy of the LENA algorithm specifically focusing on speaker recognition of adult segments (AdS) and child segments (ChS) in a sample of bi/multilingual families from India.

methodThirty neurotypical children between 6 and 24 months (

resultsThe recall and precision for AdS were 0.62 (95% confidence interval [CI] [0.61, 0.63]) and 0.83 (95% CI [0.8, 0.83]), respectively. This indicated that 62% of the segments identified as AdS by the human annotator were also identified as AdS by the LENA ASP algorithm and 83% of the segments labeled by the LENA ASP as AdS were also labeled by the human annotator as AdS. Similarly, the recall and precision for ChS were 0.65 (95% CI [0.64, 0.66]) and 0.55 (95% CI [0.54, 0.56]), respectively.

conclusionsThis study documents the performance of the ASP in correctly classifying speakers as adult or child in a sample of families from India, indicating recall and precision that is relatively low. This study lays the groundwork for future investigations aiming to refine the algorithm models, potentially facilitating more accurate performance in bi/multilingual societies like India. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.27910710.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAdultChild LanguageChild, PreschoolFamilyFemaleHumansIndiaInfantMaleMultilingualismReproducibility of ResultsSpeechSpeech Recognition Software

Identifiers

PMID39641581
PMCPMC11842061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.