ArticleACS synthetic biology2024
Mitigating Winner-Take-All Resource Competition through Antithetic Control Mechanism.
Article in ACS synthetic biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Coarse-grained resource allocation modeling for decoding and rewiring microbial metabolism.Trends in microbiology · 2026Review
- Resource Competition and Growth Dilution Modulate Synthetic Gene Cascade Dynamics.ACS synthetic biology · 2026Article
- Harnessing CRISPRi Competition to Develop Multimodule Controllers for Resource-Aware Circuit Design.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- CRISPRi-Linked Multimodule Negative Feedback Loops to Address Winner-Take-All Resource Competition.ACS synthetic biology · 2025Article
- Integrating recombinase-based feedback and feedforward control for optimal resource decoupling.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- CRISPRi-Linked Multi-Module Negative Feedback Loops to Address Winner-Take-All Resource Competition.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Competition among genes for limited transcriptional and translational resources impairs the functionality and modularity of synthetic gene circuits. Traditional control mechanisms, such as feedforward and negative feedback loops, have been proposed to alleviate these challenges, but they often focus on individual modules or inadvertently increase the burden on the system. In this study, we introduce three novel multimodule control strategies─local regulation, global regulation, and negatively competitive regulation (NCR)─that employ an antithetic regulatory mechanism to mitigate resource competition. Our systematic analysis reveals that while all three control mechanisms can alleviate resource competition to some extent, the NCR controller consistently outperforms both the global and local controllers. This superior performance stems from the unique architecture of the NCR controller, which is independent of specific parameter choices. Notably, the NCR controller not only facilitates the activation of less active modules through cross-activation mechanisms but also effectively utilizes the resource consumption within the controller itself. These findings emphasize the critical role of carefully designing the topology of multimodule controllers to ensure robust performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.