Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39641486›Full record

ArticleBioanalysis

Transforming drug discovery: the impact of AI and molecular simulation on R&D efficiency.

Hiroaki Iwata

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioanalysis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hiroaki IwataDepartment of Biological Regulation, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9791-0008

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The process of developing new drugs in the pharmaceutical industry is both time-consuming and costly, making efficiency crucial. Recent advances in hardware and computational methods have led to the widespread application of computational science approaches in drug discovery. These approaches, including artificial intelligence and molecular simulations, span from target identification to pharmacokinetics research, aiming to reduce the likelihood of failure and present lower costs. Machine learning-based methods predict new applications for developing new drugs based on accumulated knowledge, while molecular simulations estimate interactions between drugs and target proteins at the atomic level based on physical laws. Each approach has its advantages and disadvantages, and they complement each other. As a result, the future of computational science approaches in drug discovery is expected to focus on developing new methodologies that integrate these two techniques to enhance the efficiency of drug discovery.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDrug DiscoveryHumansMachine LearningMolecular Dynamics Simulationartificial intelligenceDrugsmolecular simulationspharmaceuticalspharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID39641486
PMCPMC11703525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.