Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39641087›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Improving network resilience against DDoS attacks: A fuzzy TOPSIS-based quantitative assessment approach.

Sultan H Almotiri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sultan H AlmotiriDepartment of Cybersecurity, College of Computing, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah 24211, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Security in data transmission is becoming problematic due to the internet's explosive growth as well as the spread of social media and digital advertising platforms, which have produced enormous volumes of data every day. In order to safeguard sensitive data, network security is becoming more and more important as technology is adopted. Effective information security measures are needed to protect against a variety of dangers, given the expanding number of users. A key factor in improving security is network security attributes, which include message encryption, password breaking, safeguarding wireless networks, and finding security holes. This paper adopts the Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) approach, utilising a fuzzy TOPSIS-based method, with the objective of systematically evaluating resilience in network security, especially against DDoS attacks. The research assesses different security attributes and vulnerabilities to offer actionable insights on how best to strengthen organizational cybersecurity frameworks. The methodology encompasses conducting network security audits to identify vulnerabilities that could compromise commercial operations or expose sensitive data. The findings provide critical insights that can inform targeted actions to address these vulnerabilities and enhance resource protection. The results indicate that network N6 is the most secure under DDoS attacks, followed by networks N1, N5, N3, N4, and N2. This research is significant as it aids strategic decision-making, strengthens network defenses, and enhances overall cybersecurity resilience in an era of evolving cyber threats. By addressing the complexities of network security assessments, this study makes a crucial contribution to the ongoing efforts of organisations to safeguard their data, employees, and customer information from sophisticated cyber threats.

Indexed as

DDoSFuzzy logicMCDMNetwork securityPerformance evaluation

Identifiers

PMID39641087
PMCPMC11617140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.