Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39641058›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in a small rural southern state: Results of a weighted random sample survey.

Mark L Williams, James P Selig, Benjamin C Amick Iii, Ji Li, Don E Willis, Shashank Kraleti, Sandra M Meredith-Neve, Sheena CarlLee, Pearl A McElfish

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mark L WilliamsFay W. Boozman College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham St., Little Rock, AR, 72205, USA.
James P SeligFay W. Boozman College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Northwest, 2708 S. 48th St., Springdale, AR, 72762, USA.
Benjamin C Amick IiiFay W. Boozman College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham St., Little Rock, AR, 72205, USA.
Ji LiFay W. Boozman College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Northwest, 2708 S. 48th St., Springdale, AR, 72762, USA.
Don E WillisCollege of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Northwest, 2708 S. 48th St., Springdale, AR, 72762, USA.
Shashank KraletiCollege of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham St., Little Rock, AR, 72205, USA.
Sandra M Meredith-NeveIntegrated Medicine Service Line, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham St., Little Rock, AR, 72205, USA.
Sheena CarlLeeCollege of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Northwest, 1125 N. College Ave., Fayetteville, AR, 72703, USA.
Pearl A McElfishCollege of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Northwest, 2708 S. 48th St., Springdale, AR, 72762, USA.

Funding

Evaluation of the cognitive function and socioeconomic, biomedical, and genetic risk factors of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRD) in older Marshallese residents of Northwest ArkansasR01MD013852 · NIMHD · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI MCELFISH, PEARL · 2019 to 2023
$7.2M
NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD013852
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: COVID-19 remains a significant health threat to the United States (U.S.) and the world even after the development of effective vaccines. Throughout the pandemic, rural areas have been more hesitant to be vaccinated for COVID-19 than more urban counterparts. The purpose of this study was to assess predictors of vaccine hesitancy in a small, largely rural, southern state using a multivariate model that would allow an assessment of independent predictors of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Methods: Cross-sectional survey research was conducted using data collected from a weighted random sample of 1500 individuals residing in Arkansas, U.S. Data were collected using random digit dialing of landline and cell phone numbers between July 12 and July 30, 2021. Participants were asked about their hesitancy to be vaccinated for COVID-19. Data were analyzed using bivariate odds ratios and cumulative logit model. Results: Results found 47 % of the sample were hesitant to be vaccinated. Bivariate analysis found vaccine hesitancy to be related to age, race/ethnicity, rural residence, education, employment, and having had COVID-19. Multivariate analysis showed sex, age, rural residence, and history of having had COVID-19 were associated with hesitancy. A history of vaccination/trust in vaccines remained strongly negatively associated with hesitancy. Conclusion: Findings suggest population diversity may account for vaccine hesitancy across jurisdictions, suggesting public health messages be tailored to a local audience. The strongest finding suggests vaccinations should be emphasized in general to build habits of being vaccinated.

Indexed as

ArkansasCOVID-19COVID-19 vaccineRural populationsUnited StatesVaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID39641058
PMCPMC11617713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.