ArticleHeliyon2024
COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in a small rural southern state: Results of a weighted random sample survey.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: COVID-19 remains a significant health threat to the United States (U.S.) and the world even after the development of effective vaccines. Throughout the pandemic, rural areas have been more hesitant to be vaccinated for COVID-19 than more urban counterparts. The purpose of this study was to assess predictors of vaccine hesitancy in a small, largely rural, southern state using a multivariate model that would allow an assessment of independent predictors of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Methods: Cross-sectional survey research was conducted using data collected from a weighted random sample of 1500 individuals residing in Arkansas, U.S. Data were collected using random digit dialing of landline and cell phone numbers between July 12 and July 30, 2021. Participants were asked about their hesitancy to be vaccinated for COVID-19. Data were analyzed using bivariate odds ratios and cumulative logit model. Results: Results found 47 % of the sample were hesitant to be vaccinated. Bivariate analysis found vaccine hesitancy to be related to age, race/ethnicity, rural residence, education, employment, and having had COVID-19. Multivariate analysis showed sex, age, rural residence, and history of having had COVID-19 were associated with hesitancy. A history of vaccination/trust in vaccines remained strongly negatively associated with hesitancy. Conclusion: Findings suggest population diversity may account for vaccine hesitancy across jurisdictions, suggesting public health messages be tailored to a local audience. The strongest finding suggests vaccinations should be emphasized in general to build habits of being vaccinated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.