ArticleFrontiers in molecular neuroscience2024
Inhibition of midbrain cholinergic neurons impairs decision-making strategies during reversal learning.
Article in Frontiers in molecular neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The pedunculopontine nucleus (PPN) plays a role in coordinating complex behaviors and adapting to changing environmental conditions. The specific role of cholinergic neurons in PPN function is not well understood, but their ascending connectivity with basal ganglia and thalamus suggests involvement in adaptive functions. Methods: We used a chemogenetic approach in ChAT::Cre rats to explore the specific contribution of PPN cholinergic neurons to behavioral flexibility, focusing on the adaptation to shifting reward contingencies in a Reversal Learning Task. Rats were first trained in a non-probabilistic reversal learning task, followed by a probabilistic phase to challenge their adaptive strategies under varying reward conditions. Results: Motor functions were evaluated to confirm that behavioral observations were not confounded by motor deficits. We found that inhibition of PPN cholinergic neurons did not affect performance in the non-probabilistic condition but significantly altered the rats' ability to adapt to the probabilistic condition. Under chemogenetic inhibition, the rats showed a marked deficiency in utilizing previous trial outcomes for decision-making and an increased sensitivity to negative outcomes. Logistic regression and Q-learning models revealed that suppression of PPN cholinergic activity impaired the adaptation of decision-making strategies. Discussion: Our results highlight the role of PPN cholinergic neurons in dynamically updating action-outcome expectations and adapting to new contingencies. The observed impairments in decision-making under PPN cholinergic inhibition align with cognitive deficits associated with cholinergic dysfunction in neurodegenerative disorders. These findings suggest that cholinergic neurons in the PPN are essential for maximizing rewards through the flexible updating of behavioral strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.