ArticleEClinicalMedicine2024
Development and validation of the MRI-based deep learning classifier for distinguishing perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease from cryptoglandular fistula: a multicenter cohort study.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Transperineal ultrasonography in detecting penetrating perianal disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of Crohn's & colitis · 2026Pooled it
- Inflammatory bowel disease treatment: Mechanisms to clinical translation (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in anal fistula: mapping evidence to IDEAL stages.Annals of coloproctology · 2026Review
- Magnetic resonance imaging to differentiate between Crohn's disease-associated and cryptoglandular perianal fistula.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Perianal Crohn's Disease in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Diagnosis, Assessment and Treatment.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- MRI-based radiomics-deep learning model for preoperative pathogen prediction in perianal abscesses.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Differential Diagnosis Value of Neutrophil Gelatinase Associated Lipocalin as a Noninvasive Biomarker in Perianal Fistulizing Crohn's Disease.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A singular reliable modality for early distinguishing perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease (PFCD) from cryptoglandular fistula (CGF) is currently lacking. We aimed to develop and validate an MRI-based deep learning classifier to effectively discriminate between them. Methods: The present study retrospectively enrolled 1054 patients with PFCD or CGF from three Chinese tertiary referral hospitals between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2021. The patients were divided into four cohorts: training cohort (n = 800), validation cohort (n = 100), internal test cohort (n = 100) and external test cohort (n = 54). Two deep convolutional neural networks (DCNN), namely MobileNetV2 and ResNet50, were respectively trained using the transfer learning strategy on a dataset consisting of 44871 MR images. The performance of the DCNN models was compared to that of radiologists using various metrics, including receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Delong testing was employed for comparing the area under curves (AUCs). Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to explore potential factors associated with classifier performance. Findings: A total of 532 PFCD and 522 CGF patients were included. Both pre-trained DCNN classifiers achieved encouraging performances in the internal test cohort (MobileNetV2 AUC: 0.962, 95% CI 0.903-0.990; ResNet50 AUC: 0.963, 95% CI 0.905-0.990), as well as external test cohort (MobileNetV2 AUC: 0.885, 95% CI 0.769-0.956; ResNet50 AUC: 0.874, 95% CI 0.756-0.949). They had greater AUCs than the radiologists (all p ≤ 0.001), while had comparable AUCs to each other (p = 0.83 and p = 0.60 in the two test cohorts). None of the potential characteristics had a significant impact on the performance of pre-trained MobileNetV2 classifier in etiologic diagnosis. Previous fistula surgery influenced the performance of the pre-trained ResNet50 classifier in the internal test cohort (OR 0.157, 95% CI 0.025-0.997, p = 0.05). Interpretation: The developed DCNN classifiers exhibited superior robustness in distinguishing PFCD from CGF compared to artificial visual assessment, showing their potential for assisting in early detection of PFCD. Our findings highlight the promising generalized performance of MobileNetV2 over ResNet50, rendering it suitable for deployment on mobile terminals. Funding: National Natural Science Foundation of China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.