Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39640929›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2024

Public health, policy, and clinical interventions to improve perinatal care for migrant women and infants in high-income countries: a systematic review.

Kerrie Stevenson, Samuel Edwards, Kemi Ogunlana, Maha Alomari, Rukayat Agoropopoola, William Henderson, Nuria Sanchez Clemente, Hannah Rayment-Jones, Majel McGranahan, Maria Marti Castaner and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Socioeconomic and Geographical Analysis on Antenatal Care Visits in Indonesia: A Cross-sectional Study.International journal of community based nursing and midwifery · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. The Role of Ethnicity and Migration in Perinatal Inequalities: A Retrospective Cohort Study.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Kerrie StevensonGreat Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, WC1N 1EH, UK.
Samuel EdwardsWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7HL, UK.
Kemi OgunlanaGreat Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, WC1N 1EH, UK.
Maha AlomariGreat Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, WC1N 1EH, UK.
Rukayat AgoropopoolaGreat Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, WC1N 1EH, UK.
William HendersonLibrary Services, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Nuria Sanchez ClementeCentre for Neonatal and Paediatric Infection, St. George's University, London, SW17 0RE, UK.
Hannah Rayment-JonesDepartment of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, Strand, London, WC2R 2LS, UK.
Majel McGranahanWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7HL, UK.
Maria Marti CastanerDanish Research Centre for Migration, Ethnicity, and Health, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, 1014 København K, Denmark.
Serena LuchenskiCollaborative Centre for Inclusion Health, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 7HB, UK.
Gracia FellmethNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK.
Fiona StevensonResearch Department of Primary Care and Health, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW33 2PF, UK.
Marian KnightNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK.
Robert AldridgeInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Migrant women who are pregnant or postpartum and their infants are often at increased risk of poorer perinatal outcomes compared to host country populations. This review aimed to identify public health, policy, and clinical interventions to improve maternity care for migrant women and their infants in high-income countries (HICs). Methods: In this systematic review we searched EMBASE, EMCARE, MEDLINE and PsycINFO, CENTRAL, Scopus, CINAHL Plus, Web of Science, and grey literature from inception to 13th March 2024, with no language or date restrictions (PROSPERO: CRD42022380678). Interventional and observational studies assessing the effectiveness of any intervention to improve perinatal care for migrant women and their infants in HICs delivered in the pregnancy, peripartum, or postpartum period (up to one year after birth) were included. Quantitative outcomes were extracted. Qualitative studies were excluded. The main outcomes of interest were preterm birth, birthweight, and appointment attendance. Quantitative synthesis was conducted using Harvest plots and binomial exact calculations. Findings: 15,689 records were retrieved, 29 studies comprising data from 16,763,837 women were included. 22 studies (75.9%) included multiple interventions. Five interventions had strong evidence of effectiveness. Two clinical interventions: 100.0% of studies including specialist multidisciplinary teams improved one or more of the main outcomes of interest, namely preterm birth, birthweight, and appointment attendance (95% confidence interval 73.5-100.0%; p < 0.001); and 90.9% of studies including specialist in-person interpreting improved one or more of the main outcomes of interest (58.7-100.0%; p = 0.012). Three public health or policy interventions: 100.0% of social welfare interventions (75.3%-100.0%; p < 0.001) improved one or more of the main outcomes of interest; 100.0% of maternal education interventions (71.5-100.0%. p < 0.001), and 83.3% of studies assessing access to free healthcare (51.6-97.9%; p = 0.039). Interpretation: The findings suggest that multicomponent interventions comprising multidisciplinary teams, in-person interpreting, maternal education, and social welfare support can improve perinatal outcomes for migrant women and their infants. Removing financial barriers to care may improve perinatal outcomes and be cost saving to healthcare systems. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution given that most included studies were of poor quality and that sensitivity analysis restricting to interventional studies only did not demonstrate any effect on the main outcomes of interest. Funding: KS is supported by a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Doctoral Fellowship (NIHR302577). HRJ is supported by an NIHR Advanced Fellowship (NIHR303183). HRJ is supported by NIHR Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) South London. MM is supported by a Medical Research Council Clinical Research Training Fellowship (Grant number MR/W01498X/1). GF is supported by a Nuffield Department of Population Health Clinical Research Fellowship. MK is an NIHR Senior Investigator (NIHR303806). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.

Indexed as

Health policyObstetricsPaediatricsPublic health

Identifiers

PMID39640929
PMCPMC11617313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.