Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39640904›Full record

ArticleToxicology reports2024

Outcome assessment of acute methanol poisoning: A risk-prediction nomogram approach for in-hospital mortality.

Walaa G Abdelhamid, Ghada N El-Sarnagawy, Zahraa Khalifa Sobh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Walaa G AbdelhamidForensic Medicine and Clinical Toxicology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Ghada N El-SarnagawyForensic Medicine and Clinical Toxicology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
Zahraa Khalifa SobhForensic Medicine and Clinical Toxicology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute methanol poisoning could be associated with high morbidities and fatalities. Stratifying high-risk patients is crucial in improving their prognosis. Hence, this study aimed to identify patients with methanol poisoning at high risk of in-hospital mortality. Also, the risk factors for blindness were assessed. The study included 180 acutely methanol-poisoned patients who received standard medical care. Out of 180 patients, 52 (28.9 %) patients presented with blindness, and 43 (23.9 %) patients died. The predictive model was based on four significant variables, including blindness, mean arterial pressure, serum bicarbonate, and serum creatinine. The presence of blindness and elevated serum creatinine significantly increased the likelihood of mortality by 14.274 and 5.670 times, respectively. Likewise, decreases in mean arterial pressure and serum bicarbonate significantly increased mortality risk by 0.908 and 0.407 times, respectively. The proposed nomogram exhibited excellent discriminatory power (area under the curve (AUC)=0.978, accuracy=93.3 %), which outperforms the AUCs of individual predictors. The provided nomogram is easily applicable with outstanding discrimination, making it clinically helpful in predicting in-hospital mortality in acutely methanol-poisoned patients. Regarding the risk factors for blindness, multivariable regression analysis revealed that delayed time for admission (OR=1.039; 95 % CI=1.010-1.069;

Indexed as

Methanol PoisoningMortalityNomogramOutcomeSevere Visual Impairment, Blindness

Identifiers

PMID39640904
PMCPMC11617918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.