ArticleHeliyon2024
Endoscopic brush sampling identifies mucosa associated microbiota in colorectal adenomas.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The intestinal microbiome plays a crucial role in colorectal adenomas and the mucosa associated microbiota are thought to play a more critical role in interactions with the host immune system. Current omics approaches, offer a holistic assessment of the gut microbiome and the human host interaction. To enhance the value of data from these sequencing methods, appropriate sample collection is vital. We evaluated the potential use of endoscopic brush samples for mucosal microbiota analysis in colorectal adenomas and compared it with direct adenoma tissue sequencing in terms of microbial gene sequencing. The results showed a significant increase in microbial diversity in samples collected by the endoscopic brush, which did not interfere with pathological biopsy. This study found that utilizing endoscopic brush sampling for the microbiome analysis of colorectal adenomas offers several advantages over the direct examination of microbiomes within tumor tissues, including the capacity to accurately collect gut microbiome from different locations in the intestine, circumventing interference from tissue genes, providing more abundant microbial data and enabling inclusion of small adenomas without disrupting pathological biopsies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.