ReviewHeliyon2024
Burden of illness of non-hematopoietic stem cell transplant-related hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome: A systematic review.
Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Critical care in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Common complications and management.World journal of critical care medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS)/veno-occlusive disease (VOD) is generally associated with hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT), but little is known about this condition outside the HCT setting. This systematic review examines the burden of illness and current management approaches in non-HCT SOS/VOD. Methods: We searched Embase, Medline, and grey literature sources for non-HCT SOS/VOD studies published 2002-2023. Inclusion criteria were studies of any design reporting incidence, diagnosis, underlying disease and any ongoing treatment at the time of SOS/VOD onset, management of non-HCT SOS/VOD, clinical burden, health-related quality of life, healthcare resource use, costs, and patients' unmet needs. Studies investigating pulmonary VOD or SOS/VOD related to the ingestion of pyrrolizidine alkaloids were excluded.Two authors independently screened results, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of studies using the Motheral scale for retrospective studies, Newcastle-Ottawa scale for prospective studies and case control studies, the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized controlled trials, and the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool for case series. Results were synthesized narratively. Results: Ninety-two studies were included; 57 % were retrospective cohort studies and 70 % were conducted in the US or Europe. The study populations included hematological and solid tumor cancers, various indications for liver transplant, Wilms' tumor, and transfusion-dependent beta thalassemia. Non-HCT SOS/VOD occurs most frequently in people with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Approximately 35 % of oxaliplatin-treated CRLM patients and 5 % of ALL and AML patients have non-HCT SOS/VOD. Diagnosis varies according to initial disease setting. Defibrotide is the most frequently reported treatment. Most studies did not clearly report their data sources or methods of outcome assessment. Conclusion: Non-HCT SOS/VOD occurs in diverse disease conditions, therefore guidelines on diagnosis and treatment are needed to optimize management in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.