ArticleHeliyon2024
The analysis of credit governance in the digital economy development under artificial neural networks.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2025-10-01Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Objections by Author(s) · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper aims to provide new avenues for innovation in credit governance in the digital economy to provide more reliable credit evaluation solutions for financial, commercial, and social interactions. This paper integrates the potential value of Internet of Things (IoT) technology in credit governance and proposes a credit governance method that utilizes IoT data and an improved Long Short-Term Memory model. The proposed model introduces an adaptive mechanism to monitor changes in data in real-time and automatically adjust network parameters to improve the model performance. Experimental validation is conducted on the University of California Irvine dataset. It is found that the proposed model performs well in terms of accuracy, F1 value, and Area Under the Curve value, with values of 0.9, 0.91, and 0.94, respectively. This indicates that the proposed model has higher classification accuracy and performance in classification tasks while maintaining efficient training time. This indicates that the presented method has potential application prospects in credit governance research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.