ReviewHeliyon2024
Mapping digital entrepreneurial intention: A comprehensive bibliometric study.
Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study provides a bibliometric analysis of scholarly works from 2010 to 2023 that discuss intentions for digital entrepreneurship. The report attempts to shed light on the primary contributors, research trends, and significance of this area in relation to digitalization and entrepreneurship. Using the Scopus database, a total of 134 pertinent scholarly publications were found and examined. Beginning with a summary of the publication trends for the given time period, the bibliometric analysis is conducted. It shows a consistent increase in the quantity of papers on digital entrepreneurial intention, demonstrating the scholars' growing interest and attention in this subject. To pinpoint the main contributors and their geographic distribution, the study goes further and looks at how publications are distributed across years, authors, institutions, and nations. The analysis identifies a number of productive scholars who have made significant contributions to the field of digital entrepreneurial intention in terms of authors. The understanding and growth of digital entrepreneurship have advanced significantly thanks to their knowledge and reliable publication output. The analysis also highlights networks and collaboration between institutions and authors, demonstrating the collaborative nature of this field of research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.