Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39640729›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Field-grown tomato yield estimation using point cloud segmentation with 3D shaping and RGB pictures from a field robot and digital single lens reflex cameras.

B Ambrus, G Teschner, A J Kovács, M Neményi, L Helyes, Z Pék, S Takács, T Alahmad, A Nyéki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

B AmbrusSzéchenyi István University, Albert Kázmér Faculty of Mosonmagyaróvár, Department of Biosystems and Precision Technology, Vár 2., Mosonmagyaróvár 9200, Hungary.
G TeschnerSzéchenyi István University, Albert Kázmér Faculty of Mosonmagyaróvár, Department of Biosystems and Precision Technology, Vár 2., Mosonmagyaróvár 9200, Hungary.
A J KovácsSzéchenyi István University, Albert Kázmér Faculty of Mosonmagyaróvár, Department of Biosystems and Precision Technology, Vár 2., Mosonmagyaróvár 9200, Hungary.
M NeményiSzéchenyi István University, Albert Kázmér Faculty of Mosonmagyaróvár, Department of Biosystems and Precision Technology, Vár 2., Mosonmagyaróvár 9200, Hungary.
L HelyesHungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Institute of Horticultural, Páter Károly 1, Gödöllő, 2100, Hungary.
Z PékHungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Institute of Horticultural, Páter Károly 1, Gödöllő, 2100, Hungary.
S TakácsHungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Institute of Horticultural, Páter Károly 1, Gödöllő, 2100, Hungary.
T AlahmadSzéchenyi István University, Albert Kázmér Faculty of Mosonmagyaróvár, Department of Biosystems and Precision Technology, Vár 2., Mosonmagyaróvár 9200, Hungary.
A NyékiSzéchenyi István University, Albert Kázmér Faculty of Mosonmagyaróvár, Department of Biosystems and Precision Technology, Vár 2., Mosonmagyaróvár 9200, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to estimate field-grown tomato yield (weight) and quantity of tomatoes using a self-developed robot and digital single lens reflex (DSLR) camera pictures. The authors suggest a new approach to predicting tomato yield that is based on images taken in the field, 3D scanning, and shape. Field pictures were used for tomato segmentation to determine the ripeness of the crop. A convolution neural network (CNN) model using TensorFlow library was devised for the segmentation of tomato berries along with a small robot, which had a 59.3 % F1 score. To enhance the accurate tomato crop model and to estimate the yield later, point cloud imaging was applied using a Ciclops 3D scanner. The best fitting sphere model was generated using the 3D model. The most optimal model was the 3D model, which gave the best representation and provided the weight of the tomatoes with a relative error of 21.90 % and a standard deviation of 17.9665 %. The results indicate a consistent object-based classification of the tomato crop above the plant/row level with an accuracy of 55.33 %, which is better than in-row sampling (images taken by the robot). By comparing the measured and estimated yield, the average difference for DSLR camera images was more favorable at 3.42 kg.

Indexed as

3D point cloud shapingApproximation with sphere and 3D modelConvolution neural networkImage segmentation and calibrationMachine learning methodTomato yield estimation

Identifiers

PMID39640729
PMCPMC11619985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.