ArticleHeliyon2024
Field-grown tomato yield estimation using point cloud segmentation with 3D shaping and RGB pictures from a field robot and digital single lens reflex cameras.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Navigation and Sensor Fusion for Autonomous Field Robots in Precision Agriculture: Narrative Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Next-generation translational genomics for developing future crops.Functional & integrative genomics · 2025Review
- Adaptive Symmetry Self-Matching for 3D Point Cloud Completion of Occluded Tomato Fruits in Complex Canopy Environments.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to estimate field-grown tomato yield (weight) and quantity of tomatoes using a self-developed robot and digital single lens reflex (DSLR) camera pictures. The authors suggest a new approach to predicting tomato yield that is based on images taken in the field, 3D scanning, and shape. Field pictures were used for tomato segmentation to determine the ripeness of the crop. A convolution neural network (CNN) model using TensorFlow library was devised for the segmentation of tomato berries along with a small robot, which had a 59.3 % F1 score. To enhance the accurate tomato crop model and to estimate the yield later, point cloud imaging was applied using a Ciclops 3D scanner. The best fitting sphere model was generated using the 3D model. The most optimal model was the 3D model, which gave the best representation and provided the weight of the tomatoes with a relative error of 21.90 % and a standard deviation of 17.9665 %. The results indicate a consistent object-based classification of the tomato crop above the plant/row level with an accuracy of 55.33 %, which is better than in-row sampling (images taken by the robot). By comparing the measured and estimated yield, the average difference for DSLR camera images was more favorable at 3.42 kg.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.