ArticleHeliyon2024
Introducing a novel dataset for facial emotion recognition and demonstrating significant enhancements in deep learning performance through pre-processing techniques.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Facial expression recognition (FER) plays a pivotal role in various applications, ranging from human-computer interaction to psychoanalysis. To improve the accuracy of facial emotion recognition (FER) models, this study focuses on enhancing and augmenting FER datasets. It comprehensively analyzes the Facial Emotion Recognition dataset (FER13) to identify defects and correct misclassifications. The FER13 dataset represents a crucial resource for researchers developing Deep Learning (DL) models aimed at recognizing emotions based on facial features. Subsequently, this article develops a new facial dataset by expanding upon the original FER13 dataset. Similar to the FER + dataset, the expanded dataset incorporates a wider range of emotions while maintaining data accuracy. To further improve the dataset, it will be integrated with the extended Cohn-Kanade (CK+) dataset. This paper investigates the application of modern DL models to enhance emotion recognition in human faces. By training a new dataset, the study demonstrates significant performance gains compared with its counterparts. Furthermore, the article examines recent advances in FER technology and identifies critical requirements for DL models to overcome the inherent challenges of this task effectively. The study explores several DL architectures for emotion recognition in facial image datasets, with a particular focus on convolutional neural networks (CNNs). Our findings indicate that complex architecture, such as EfficientNetB7, outperforms other DL architectures, achieving a test accuracy of 78.9 %. Notably, the model surpassed the EfficientNet-XGBoost model, especially when used with the new dataset. Our approach leverages EfficientNetB7 as a backbone to build a model capable of efficiently recognizing emotions from facial images. Our proposed model, EfficientNetB7-CNN, achieved a peak accuracy of 81 % on the test set despite facing challenges such as GPU memory limitations. This demonstrates the model's robustness in handling complex facial expressions. Furthermore, to enhance feature extraction and attention mechanisms, we propose a new hybrid model, CBAM-4CNN, which integrates the convolutional block attention module (CBAM) with a custom 4-layer CNN architecture. The results showed that the CBAM-4CNN model outperformed existing models, achieving higher accuracy, precision, and recall metrics across multiple emotion classes. The results highlight the critical role of comprehensive and diverse data in enhancing model performance for facial emotion recognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.