Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39640684›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Tough gelatine hydrogels reinforced with silk fibroin nanofiber.

Maho Shibata, Yoko Okahisa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maho ShibataDepartment of Biobased Materials Science, Graduate School of Science and Technology, Kyoto Institute of Technology, Matsugasaki Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8585, Japan.
Yoko OkahisaFibre Science and Engineering, Kyoto Institute of Technology, Matsugasaki Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8585, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gelatine hydrogels exhibit potential as biomaterials such as wound-healing materials, artificial organs, scaffolds for cell culture and drug delivery systems because of their good biocompatibility. However, their practical applications are limited by their poor mechanical properties and high degradability. In this study, mechanically fibrillated silk fibroin (fibroin nanofibers; FNF) was used to reinforce gelatine hydrogels. The resulting gelatine hydrogels with FNF exhibited enhanced toughness compared to those reinforced with conventional aqueous regenerated fibroin (RF), which were prepared by treatment with a highly concentrated LiBr solvent or a neat gelatine hydrogel while retaining their softness. The average pore size of the gelatine hydrogel was 2.2 μm, while the gelatine hydrogel containing 25 % FNF expanded to 6.7 μm. A web-like network was formed between the pores. The addition of FNF increased the relative

Indexed as

BiodegradationGelatine hydrogelMechanical propertiesSilk fibroin nanofiber

Identifiers

PMID39640684
PMCPMC11620089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.