ArticleHeliyon2024
Ultrasound-guided suction using negative pressure, curettage, and percutaneous drainage to treat rectus sheath hematoma.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to introduce and evaluate a new treatment method for rectus sheath hematoma: ultrasound-guided suction using negative pressure, curettage, and percutaneous drainage. Methods: This retrospective study involved five patients with rectus sheath hematoma rectus sheath hematoma who had cesarean sections. For all patients, ultrasound revealed that the maximum diameter of their hematoma exceeded 70 mm. We summarized and analyzed the therapeutic effects of five patients and introduced the procedure, technical points, precautions, advantages, and indications of the procedure. Results: In all five patients, hematoma area was significantly reduced as confirmed by ultrasound at follow-up, and all patients' abdominal pain were significantly relieved. No complications, including bleeding or infection, were detected at both the 2-h postoperative and 3-day follow-up assessments. The hematoma volume reduction rates were 90 %, 67 %, 81 %, 68 %, and 70 % at three days re-examinations, and 99 %, 96 %, 98 %, 98 %, and 90 % at the 30-day follow-up. Conclusion: The removal of rectus sheath hematoma by suction using negative pressure can prevent patients from undergoing abdominal wall exploration, offering a less invasive alternative while potentially achieving comparable therapeutic effect to surgical hematoma removal in certain cases. This treatment method shows potential for clinical application, particularly in relatively young and healthy postpartum women, and is expected to be popularized and applied in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.