Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39640564›Full record

ArticleiScience2024

Gene expansion in the hawkmoth

Megha Treesa Tom, Philipp Brand, Sascha Bucks, Jin Zhang, Mario Ernesto Escobar Huezo, Bill S Hansson, Sonja Bisch-Knaden

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Classification of Odor-Derived Electroantennograms with Machine Learning.Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Megha Treesa TomDepartment of Evolutionary Neuroethology, Max-Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany.
Philipp BrandLaboratory of Neurophysiology and Behavior, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA.
Sascha BucksDepartment of Evolutionary Neuroethology, Max-Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany.
Jin ZhangDepartment of Evolutionary Neuroethology, Max-Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany.
Mario Ernesto Escobar HuezoDepartment of Evolutionary Neuroethology, Max-Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany.
Bill S HanssonDepartment of Evolutionary Neuroethology, Max-Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany.
Sonja Bisch-KnadenDepartment of Evolutionary Neuroethology, Max-Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In insects, odorant receptors (ORs) are required for the detection of most olfactory cues. We investigated the function of a clade of four duplicated

Indexed as

Cell biologyEvolutionary ecologySensory neuroscience

Identifiers

PMID39640564
PMCPMC11617253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.