Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39640549›Full record

ArticleAnimal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui)2024

Maternal probiotic mixture supplementation optimizes the gut microbiota structure of offspring piglets through the gut-breast axis.

Ting Hu, Zhiguan Song, Lan Yang, Keyuan Chen, Yi Wu, Fei Xie, Jiufeng Wang, Guiyan Yang, Yaohong Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. EngineeredAnimal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2026
    Article
  5. Early-life intervention withFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ting HuCollege of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Zhiguan SongCollege of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Lan YangAnimal Disease Prevention and Control Center of Shanxi Province, Taiyuan 030027, China.
Keyuan ChenCollege of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Yi WuCollege of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Fei XieBeijing Da Bei Nong Science and Technology Group Co., Ltd., Beijing 100192, China.
Jiufeng WangCollege of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Guiyan YangCollege of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Yaohong ZhuCollege of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Delivery and weaning are major stressful events in sows and piglets, adversely affecting production and growth performance and causing economic losses to swine farms. Probiotics as safe antibiotic alternatives have great potential for use across all stages of livestock farming. Here, 18 pregnant sows from clinical farms randomly were divided into two groups: one fed a basal diet (CON group) and the other fed a basal diet plus a probiotic mixture CBB-mix (containing 1×10

Indexed as

Colostrum metabolomeGut–breast axisGut microbiotaPigletProbiotic mixtureSow

Identifiers

PMID39640549
PMCPMC11617873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.