ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2025
Scatter correction for contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis with a dual-layer detector.
Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Theoretical modeling and performance analysis of a direct-indirect dual-layer flat-panel detector for contrast-enhanced breast imaging.Medical physics · 2026Article
- Scatter correction for contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis with a dual-layer detector.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2025Article
- Introduction to the Special Issue: Celebrating Digital Tomosynthesis-Past, Present, and Future.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis (CEDBT) highlights breast tumors with neo-angiogenesis. A recently proposed CEDBT system with a dual-layer (DL) flat-panel detector enables simultaneous acquisition of high-energy (HE) and low-energy (LE) projection images with a single exposure, which reduces acquisition time and eliminates motion artifacts. However, x-ray scatter degrades image quality and lesion detectability. We propose a practical method for accurate and robust scatter correction (SC) for DL-CEDBT. Approach: The proposed hybrid SC method combines the advantages of a two-kernel iterative convolution method and an empirical interpolation strategy, which accounts for the reduced scatter from the peripheral breast region due to thickness roll-off and the scatter contribution from the region outside the breast. Scatter point spread functions were generated using Monte Carlo simulations with different breast glandular fractions, compressed thicknesses, and projection angles. Projection images and ground truth scatter maps of anthropomorphic digital breast phantoms were simulated to evaluate the performance of the proposed SC method and three other kernel- and interpolation-based methods. The mean absolute relative error (MARE) between scatter estimates and ground truth was used as the metric for SC accuracy. Results: DL-CEDBT shows scatter characteristics different from dual-shot, primarily due to the two energy peaks of the incident spectrum and the structure of the DL detector. Compared with the other methods investigated, the proposed hybrid SC method showed superior accuracy and robustness, with MARE of Conclusions: A practical SC method was developed, which provided accurate and robust scatter estimates to improve image quality and lesion detectability for DL-CEDBT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.