ArticleVaccine: X2024
Adverse events following immunization with DTaP-IPV (Tetraxim) in school-aged children in Taiwan, 2017-2020.
Article in Vaccine: X, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vaccination has been an effective method to prevent and control diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis and polio diseases in infancy and adults for years. To maintain the protective effect, a DTaP-IPV vaccine, Tetraxim, was introduced into Taiwan's national immunization program for children at 5 years of age after primary series vaccination in infancy in October 2017 replacing a Tdap-IPV. To survey the safety of this vaccine, data between 01 October 2017 and 31 December 2020 from two surveillance systems, the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) and Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP), were reviewed. We analysed patient's demographics, symptoms, time of onset, and outcome. A total of 667,497 doses of DTaP-IPV vaccine were administered during the study period. We combined data from VAERS and VICP and deleted duplicate subjects and reports. There was a total of 59 subjects with AEs and the reporting rate of AEs was 8.8 subjects per 100,000 doses. The most common AEs were injection site erythema and swelling. AEs occurred with a median 1 day after vaccination (range 0-3 days). Among the 59 subjects, eight (13.6 %) with serious AEs were hospitalized. These serious AEs included injection site erythema, swelling or extensive limb swelling after vaccination and hospitalization might have been due to ELS that was misdiagnosed as cellulitis. The national passive surveillance data support the safety profile of Tetraxim as a school-entry booster in children at 5 years old in Taiwan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.