ArticleSurgical neurology international2024
Management of complex vertebral artery anatomy in craniocervical surgery: A case report.
Article in Surgical neurology international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The vertebral artery loops: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Pooled it
- Case report: Incidental finding of a duplicated right vertebral artery in a 17-year-old female with suspected systemic lupus erythematosus.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
- Progressive Acquired Cervical Deformity With Myelopathy Managed by Occipitocervicothoracic Fusion: A Case Report.Cureus · 2026Article
- Proximal and distal endovascular embolization of a penetrating V3 vertebral artery transection with adjunctive surgical ligation: A case report.Surgical neurology international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The surgery on the craniocervical junction is associated with complex techniques that endanger the vertebral artery (VA), especially if there are some anatomical variations present, thereby increasing the risk of vascular injury, particularly during cervical decompression or instrumentation. Case Description: A case of a 60-year-old female with progressive myelopathy and craniocervical junction malformation is presented. Key preoperative imaging findings included basilar invagination, C1 assimilation, and os odontoideum, along with VA anomalies such as a tortuous, hypoplastic left VA arising anomalously from the aortic arch and a right VA with a V2 segment forming a high-riding medial loop into the C2 vertebral body. The surgical procedure was performed through a posterior approach using C-arm fluoroscopy, Doppler ultrasound, and intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring, which achieved adequate deformity fixation and anterior decompression. Conclusion: Computed tomography angiography is the gold standard for assessing the preoperative VA anatomy at the craniocervical junction. Intraoperative Doppler ultrasound is invaluable because it minimizes the risk of sudden accidental injury to VAs in cases with abnormal anatomies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.