ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
Imaging findings of primary hepatic leiomyosarcoma: a case report and literature review.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Primary hepatic leiomyosarcoma diagnosed after right hepatectomy: A rare case report.Rare tumors · 2026Article
- Mesenchymal Tumors of the Liver: An Update Review.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Primary hepatic leiomyosarcoma concurrent with early-stage lung adenocarcinoma: a rare case report.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Case report and literature review: primary hepatic leiomyosarcoma with misdiagnosis and SDHB positive expression.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Primary hepatic leiomyosarcoma (PHLS) is an extremely rare malignant tumor, which is often elusive in early diagnosis due to its rarity and nonspecific clinical and imaging presentations. Herein, we present a case of PHLS in a 66-year-old male and a review of the English literature from January 2000 to December 2023, focusing on the clinical and imaging characteristics of 30 patients with PHLS. The present patient was admitted to our hospital with complaints of abdominal distension, with history of hepatitis B. Tumor markers, including alpha-fetoprotein, carcinoembryonic antigen, and CA 19-9, were within the normal range. A hepatic tumor was incidentally identified during an abdominal ultrasound examination, further evaluated by contrast-enhanced CT and MR scans, which was preliminarily misdiagnosed as hepatocellular carcinoma. The tumor was surgically excised and definitively diagnosed as PHLS, characterized by two distinct areas with varying imaging features on contrast-enhanced CT and MR images. PHLS typically manifests as a well-defined, heterogeneously hypo- or iso-dense mass on CT, with a slightly prolonged T2 signal on MRI, and exhibits gradual enhancement during dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging. We advocate that the possibility of PHLS should be considered when the aforementioned imaging features are observed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.