ArticlePLOS mental health2024
Cross-cultural adaptation of the 5-Question Stigma Indicators in trachoma-affected communities, Ethiopia.
Article in PLOS mental health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stigma is common in people affected with Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs). However, no validated tools are available to assess and monitor stigma in trachoma-affected communities. We tested the cross-cultural equivalence of the 5-question stigma indicator-affected persons (5-QSI-AP) scale in persons with trachomatous trichiasis (TT), the blinding stage of trachoma, and the 5-question stigma indicator-community stigma (5-QSI-CS) scale in person without TT, in Amhara region, Ethiopia. Conceptual, item, semantic, and operational equivalence were assessed through exploratory qualitative methods; measurement equivalence was assessed quantitatively through internal consistency, construct validity, and reproducibility. A total of 390 people participated: 181 were persons with TT, 182 persons without TT, 19 mental health, trachoma, social science, and linguistics experts, and eight interviewers. Items included in both scales were adequately relevant and important to explore stigma in the target culture. Concern about others knowing that they have TT, shame, avoidance by others, and problems getting married or in their marriage were among the issues persons with TT faced in this study community. The 5-QSI-AP had a Cronbach's α of 0.57 for internal consistency and showed adequate discriminant validity where persons with central corneal opacity from TT had higher mean stigma scores than their counterparts. The 5-QSI-CS had a Cronbach's α of 0.70 for internal consistency and a correlation of r = 0.23 with the Social Distance Scale (SDS) for convergent validity. The test-retest reliability analysis between the initial and repeat measures produced an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.60 and 0.53 for the 5-QSI-AP and 5-QSI-CS respectively, and no evidence of systematic bias in mean stigma scores. The 5-QSI scales have satisfactory cultural validity to assess and monitor stigma in this trachoma-affected Amharic-speaking study population. With further cross-cultural validation, these brief and easy to administer scales would offer the possibility to rapidly measure and monitor stigma associated with NTDs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.