Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39640208›Full record

ArticleNorth American Spine Society journal2024

External validation of SpineNetV2 on a comprehensive set of radiological features for grading lumbosacral disc pathologies.

Alemu Sisay Nigru, Sergio Benini, Matteo Bonetti, Graziella Bragaglio, Michele Frigerio, Federico Maffezzoni, Riccardo Leonardi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in North American Spine Society journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. External validation of SpineNetv2 deep learning system for automated lumbar spine MRI analysis: A multi-pathology diagnostic agreement study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alemu Sisay NigruDepartment of Information Engineering, University of Brescia, via Branze 38, Brescia 25123, Italy.
Sergio BeniniDepartment of Information Engineering, University of Brescia, via Branze 38, Brescia 25123, Italy.
Matteo BonettiX-Ray Service s.r.l., Via Guglielmo Oberdan 126, Brescia, 25128, Italy.
Graziella BragaglioX-Ray Service s.r.l., Via Guglielmo Oberdan 126, Brescia, 25128, Italy.
Michele FrigerioPoliambulatorio Oberdan, Via Guglielmo Oberdan 126, Brescia, 25128, Italy.
Federico MaffezzoniX-Ray Service s.r.l., Via Guglielmo Oberdan 126, Brescia, 25128, Italy.
Riccardo LeonardiDepartment of Information Engineering, University of Brescia, via Branze 38, Brescia 25123, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In recent years, the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) models has revolutionized the diagnosis of Low Back Pain (LBP) and associated disc pathologies. Among these, SpineNetV2 stands out as a state-of-the-art, open-access model for detecting and grading various intervertebral disc pathologies. However, ensuring the reliability and applicability of AI models like SpineNetV2 is paramount. Rigorous validation is essential to guarantee their robustness and generalizability across diverse patient cohorts and imaging protocols. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of MRI images of 1747 lumbosacral intervertebral discs (IVDs) from 353 patients (mean age, 54 ± 15.4 years, 44.5% female) with various spinal disorders, collected between September 2021 and February 2023 at X-Ray Service s.r.l. The SpineNetV2 system was used to grade 11 distinct lumbosacral disc pathologies, including Pfirrmann grading, disc narrowing, central canal stenosis, spondylolisthesis, (upper and lower) endplate defects, (upper and lower) marrow changes, (right and left) foraminal stenosis, and disc herniation, using T2-weighted sagittal MR images. Performance metrics included accuracy, balanced accuracy, precision, F1 score, Matthew's Correlation Coefficient, Brier Score Loss, Lin's concordance correlation coefficients, and Cohen's kappa coefficients. Two expert radiologists provide annotations for these discs. The evaluation of SpineNetV2's grading is compared against expert radiologists' assessments. Results: SpineNetV2 demonstrated strong performance across various metrics, with high agreement scores (Cohen's Kappa, Lin's Concordance, and Matthew's Correlation Coefficient exceeding 0.7) for most pathologies. However, lower agreement was found for foraminal stenosis and disc herniation, underscoring the limitations of sagittal MR images for evaluating these conditions. Conclusions: This study highlights the importance of external validation, emphasizing the need for comprehensive assessments of deep learning models. SpineNetV2 exhibits promising results in predicting disc pathologies, with findings guiding further improvements. The open-source release of SpineNetV2 enables researchers to independently validate and extend the model's capabilities. This collaborative approach promotes innovation and accelerates the development of more reliable and comprehensive deep learning tools for the assessment of spine pathology.

Indexed as

AI for MedicineDisc degenerationHerniationLow Back PainSpine MRISpineNetV2

Identifiers

PMID39640208
PMCPMC11617751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.