Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39640190›Full record

ReviewBladder (San Francisco, Calif.)2024

Urethral pharmacological mechanisms incontinence and bladder emptying: An updated review.

Karl-Erik Andersson, Bengt Uvelius

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bladder (San Francisco, Calif.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Orai storeoperated CaChannels (Austin, Tex.) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Karl-Erik AnderssonDepartment of Regenerative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27101 United States.
Bengt UveliusDepartment of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, 21421 Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The urethral wall consists of layers of striated muscle, circular and longitudinal smooth muscles, collagen fibers, and a vascular plexus. However, the relative contributions of these components to urethral pressure in humans remain poorly understood. The circular and longitudinal smooth muscle components can develop a spontaneous contractile activity, generating a basal tone. They can further contract or relax in response to excitatory or inhibitory stimuli. Animal studies suggest that smooth muscle activity in the mid-urethra plays a crucial role in determining maximal urethral closing pressure. Notably, the highest sympathetic activity occurs in the middle segment of the female urethra during increasing smooth muscle tone. This finding is supported by human studies that did not detect any electromyographic activity from striated muscle in this region. Objectives: This study was conducted to review the contributions of the primary structural components and control mechanisms of urethral. Conclusion: In females, the external urethral striated sphincter is located at the distal urethra, which is not the segment associated with the highest closing pressure. Rather, the sphincter has been shown to modulate urethral pressure during exercise and physical stress. Basic science research does not support the notion that mid-urethral pressure is caused by the external striated sphincter tone in females. Instead, findings suggest that, at rest and during bladder filling, maximal urethral pressure is primarily determined by the activity of the urethral smooth muscles.

Indexed as

Smooth muscleStriated muscleUrethraVascular plexus

Identifiers

PMID39640190
PMCPMC11617063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.