ArticleCureus2024
Pericardial Fenestration With Monitored Anesthesia Care Using Diluted Remifentanil: A Series of 10 Cases.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Monitored anesthesia care (MAC) is an anesthesia management method in which anesthesiologists use the minimum necessary intravenous anesthetics to achieve sedation and pain relief while maintaining spontaneous breathing. The challenge for the anesthesiologist is to find the correct balance between inhibiting the patient's stress response to invasive treatment, maintaining intraoperative hemodynamic stability, and doing so as quickly as possible. We hypothesized that diluting remifentanil (D-remi) to 10 μg/mL and increasing the rate of administration would increase the responsiveness of the syringe pump and allow for better control of anesthetic depth. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of MAC with D-remi in critically ill patients. Materials We investigated 10 cases in which anesthesia was managed by MAC with D-remi during emergency pericardial fenestration after cardiovascular surgery at our institution. Each parameter related to the patients' background and circulatory dynamics was extracted retrospectively from the electronic medical records and anesthesia records. The target depth of anesthesia was set at Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) -3 to -4 on MAC with spontaneous breathing. We increased the infusion rate of this analgesic during more invasive procedures. Results In all cases, the emergency pericardial fenestration could be performed with stable hemodynamics throughout the procedure. Spontaneous respiration never disappeared in any case. Although there were six cases in which airway maintenance by mandibular elevation was required due to glossoptosis, the minimum intraoperative SpO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.