ArticleCureus2024
Comparing Postoperative Feeding Strategies in Elective Cholecystectomy Patients Under General Anesthesia: A Prospective Randomized Trial.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aims Commencing early oral feeding soon after surgery is a crucial element of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS). However, it is imperative to ensure safety with a natural progression to oral intake and patient satisfaction. In this prospective, randomized, outcome assessor-blind controlled study, we aim to compare the efficacy of postoperative feeding on-demand versus predetermined timing in patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy under general anesthesia. Materials and methods A total of 120 patients (18 to 60 years, either gender) with American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II, meeting inclusion criteria, and from the Department of General Surgery and Surgical Gastroenterology, were randomly allocated into two groups of 60 patients each. In the On-Demand group (Group OD), upon their request, patients received 200 ml of coconut water orally in small aliquots as per their comfort once fully awake. In the Predetermined-Time group (Group OT), patients received the same volume of coconut water at four hours post-surgery. The time of initial oral intake in Group OD, the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and patient satisfaction in both groups were assessed. Results There was no difference in the incidence of PONV between Group OD (13; 21.7%) and Group OT (15; 25%) (p=0.666). The majority of patients in both groups, 39 (65%) in Group OD and 40 (68%) in Group OT requested food within the initial ≤ 2 hours. Furthermore, overall satisfaction was significantly higher in Group OD compared to Group OT (p < 0.001). Conclusions Allowing postoperative oral feeding upon patient request enhances satisfaction without compromising safety as compared to adhering to predetermined schedules.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.