ReviewCureus2024
Anchorage and Stability of Orthodontic Mini Implants in Relation to Length and Types of Implants.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Success Rate of Immediately Loaded Orthodontic Temporary Anchorage Devices: A Retrospective Analysis of Patient- and Treatment-Related Factors.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Survival Rates of Reinserted Orthodontic Microimplants: An Exploratory Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- The Effect of Biomechanical Loading Parameters on the Stress and Strain Behavior of Orthodontic Mini-Implants: A Finite Element Study.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Orthodontic Implants: Novelty and Evolution in Veterinary Orthodontics-Retrospective Case Series Report.Veterinary sciences · 2025Article
- Analysis of Risk Factors Affecting Postoperative Success Rate and Postoperative Pain After Orthodontic Microimplant Nail Implantation and Improvement of Treatment Strategy.Oral health & preventive dentistry · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Computer-Aided Navigation and Augmented Reality for Bicortical Mini-Implant Placement in Maxillary Expansion: An In Vitro Study.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Micro-implant anchorage in adolescent orthodontics: a promising and advantageous option.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- Clinical efficacy of micro-implant anchorage in orthodontic treatment.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anchorage control is crucial for achieving optimal results in orthodontic treatment. Scientific literature has documented the exploration of various methods to prevent anchorage loss, including the use of extraoral and intraoral devices. The advent of mini implants and micro implants has introduced new possibilities by allowing placement in previously inaccessible areas. These implants, also known as Temporary Anchorage Devices (TADs), significantly reduce the effort required to maintain anchorage. They are a reliable anchorage for orthodontic treatments because of their small size, ease of insertion and removal, and immediate force loading upon placement. For individuals who are uncooperative or who have periodontal disease and alveolar bone loss, mini implants provide a stable substitute for anchorage during orthodontic therapy. Studies emphasize the importance of implant length and type in determining stability and success rates. Longer implants tend to increase stability, and self-drilling designs generally offer superior anchorage compared to self-tapping variants. Furthermore, titanium implants demonstrate higher success rates than stainless steel implants, highlighting their suitability for orthodontic applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.