Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39640030›Full record

ReviewChemical science2025

Best-of-both-worlds computational approaches to difficult-to-model dissociation reactions on metal surfaces.

Geert-Jan Kroes, Jörg Meyer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Capitalistic Chemistry.The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Geert-Jan KroesLeiden Institute of Chemistry, Gorlaeus Laboratories P. O. Box 9502 2300 RA Leiden The Netherlands g.j.kroes@chem.leidenuniv.nl.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4913-4689
Jörg MeyerLeiden Institute of Chemistry, Gorlaeus Laboratories P. O. Box 9502 2300 RA Leiden The Netherlands g.j.kroes@chem.leidenuniv.nl.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0146-730X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The accurate modeling of dissociative chemisorption of molecules on metal surfaces presents an exciting scientific challenge to theorists, and is practically relevant to modeling heterogeneously catalyzed reactive processes in computational catalysis. The first important scientific challenge in the field is that accurate barriers for dissociative chemisorption are not yet available from first principles methods. For systems that are not prone to charge transfer (for which the difference between the work function of the surface and the electron affinity of the molecule is larger than 7 eV) this problem can be circumvented: chemically accurate barrier heights can be extracted with a semi-empirical version of density functional theory (DFT). However, a second important challenge is posed by systems that are prone to (full or partial) electron transfer from the surface to the molecule. For these systems the Born-Oppenheimer approximation breaks down, and currently no method of established accuracy exists for modeling the resulting effect of non-adiabatic energy dissipation on the dissociative chemisorption reaction. Because two problems exist for this class of reactions, a semi-empirical approach to computing barrier heights, which would demand that computed and experimental dissociative chemisorption probabilities match, is unlikely to work. This Perspective presents a vision on how these two problems may be solved. We suggest an approach in which parameterized density functionals are used as in the previous semi-empirical approach to DFT, but in which the parameters are based on calculations with first principles electronic structure methods. We also suggest that the diffusion Monte-Carlo (DMC) and the random phase approximation (RPA) probably are the best two first principles electronic structure methods to pursue in the framework of the approach that we call first-principles based DFT (FPB-DFT) - providing DMC and the RPA with a steppingstone towards benchmarking and future applications in computational catalysis. Probably the FPB density functional is best based on screened hybrid exchange in combination with non-local van der Waals correlation. We also propose a new electronic friction method called scattering potential friction (SPF) that could combine the advantages and avoid the disadvantages of the two main existing electronic friction approaches for describing non-adiabatic effects: by extracting an electronic scattering potential from a DFT calculation for the full molecule-metal surface system, it might be possible to compute friction coefficients from scattering phase shifts in a computationally convenient and robust fashion. Combining the FPB-DFT and SPF methods may eventually result in barrier heights of chemical accuracy for the difficult-to-model class of systems that are prone to charge transfer. This should also enable the construction of a representative database of barrier heights for dissociative chemisorption on metal surfaces. Such a database would allow testing new density functionals, or, more generally, new electronic structure approaches on a class of reactions that is of huge importance to the chemical industry. Additionally, the difficult-to-model sub-class of systems we focus on is essential to sustainable chemistry and important for a sustainable future. Adding the database envisaged to large databases already existing but mostly addressing gas phase chemistry will enable testing density functionals that have a claim to universality,

Identifiers

PMID39640030
PMCPMC11616778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.