Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39639962›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X2024

Preterm birth recurrence after spontaneous preterm birth between 16-28 weeks: A national cohort study.

Annabelle L Van Gils, Anita C Ravelli, Esmé I Kamphuis, Brenda M Kazemier, Eva Pajkrt, Martijn A Oudijk, Marjon A De Boer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Annabelle L Van GilsAmsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department. of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, the Netherlands.
Anita C RavelliAmsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, the Netherlands.
Esmé I KamphuisAmsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department. of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, the Netherlands.
Brenda M KazemierAmsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department. of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, the Netherlands.
Eva PajkrtAmsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department. of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, the Netherlands.
Martijn A OudijkAmsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department. of Obstetrics and Gynecology, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, the Netherlands.
Marjon A De BoerAmsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department. of Obstetrics and Gynecology, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To assess the risk of recurrent preterm birth following spontaneous extreme preterm birth between 16 Methods: A nationwide retrospective cohort study was conducted with data from the Perinatal Registry of the Netherlands. We included nulliparous women with a singleton pregnancy that ended in spontaneous preterm birth between 16 Results: In total, 1011 women with linked pregnancies were included. The risk of preterm birth < 37 weeks with prior spontaneous birth between 16 Conclusion: Patients with previous spontaneous preterm birth from 16 weeks GA onwards are at high risk for recurrent preterm birth and should be regarded as such in the consideration of preventive measures to prevent recurrent adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Indexed as

Interpregnancy intervalMid pregnancy lossMid trimester lossPreterm birthRecurrent preterm birthRisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID39639962
PMCPMC11617680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.