Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39639915›Full record

Trial reportF1000Research2024

Coiling of echogenic perineural catheters with integral stylet: A proof-of-concept randomized control trial in a sciatic nerve block simulator and a pilot study in orthopaedic-trauma patients.

Theodosios Saranteas, Eleni Poulogiannopoulou, Maria Riga, Konstantina Panagouli, Andreas Mavrogenis, Thomas Papadimos

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in F1000Research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06568510 (Coiling of Echogenic Perineural Catheters.), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06568510 completednot on this map

Coiling of Echogenic Perineural Catheters.

TypeobservationalSponsorAttikon HospitalRan2024 to 2024Enrolled25ConditionsPain, TraumaArmsContinuous peripheral nerve block
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Theodosios SaranteasSecond Department of Anaesthesiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Attica, 15349, Greece.
Eleni PoulogiannopoulouSecond Department of Anaesthesiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Attica, 15349, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5092-9462
Maria RigaSecond Department of Anaesthesiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Attica, 15349, Greece.
Konstantina PanagouliSecond Department of Anaesthesiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Attica, 15349, Greece.
Andreas MavrogenisFirst Department of Orthopaedics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Attica, 15349, Greece.
Thomas PapadimosDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, Ohio, 43614, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Backround/Objectives: We investigated a technique that facilitates the coiling of a regular straight catheter (with integral stylet) behind the sciatic nerve in an ultrasound (US) regional anaesthesia simulator, and then applied our findings to a series of orthopedic-trauma patients. Methods: We conducted a randomized study of two methods of perineural catheter advancement in a sciatic nerve block Blue Phantom simulator. Two groups of twenty catheters each (method A and method B) were evaluated under real-time ultrasound imaging. The needle in-plane/nerve in-short-axis technique was applied. In method A the catheter was advanced beyond the needle tip with the integral stylet extending along its entire length; in method B the catheter was advanced after its integral stylet was retracted by 6 cm, thus providing flexibility to the catheter's distal end. Additionally, to assess the procedural effectiveness of method B coiling technique, a pilot study was conducted examining 25 perineural catheters coiled underneath the sciatic nerve in trauma-orthopaedic patients to document any catheter tip displacement from their initial position (for 36 hours postoperatively). Results: In the simulation study, method B led to a significantly higher percentage (18/20:90%) of coiled catheters than method A (3/20:15%). Two coiled catheters of method B were found kinked/obstructed. In our patients, after catheter insertion, the distal end of 2/25 (8%) coiled catheters was obstructed. One perineural catheter was dislodged. For the remaining 22 (88%) catheters, ultrasound imaging demonstrated that local anaesthetic infusion made contact with the sciatic nerve, indicating no displacement of the catheter's distal end postoperatively. Conclusion: Regular straight perineural catheters can be coiled if their integral stylet is partially retracted. This coiling method offers extra catheter length adjacent to the nerve structure which potentially mitigates catheter tip displacement. Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov, registration No: NCT06568510, 23/08/2024, registration URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06568510?intr=coiling%20of%20echogenic%20sciatic%20nerve&rank=1#study-overview.

Indexed as

CathetersNerve BlockSciatic NerveAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhantoms, ImagingPilot ProjectsUltrasonographyWounds and Injuriesperineural catheter coiling; sciatic nerve block; ultrasound; catheter tip dislocation; simulation.

Identifiers

PMID39639915
PMCPMC11617819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.