SynthesisFrontiers in public health2024
A systematic review and meta-analysis of breastfeeding and neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infant.
Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Associations of socioeconomic status and nurturing environment with developmental outcomes in very preterm children without sensorimotor impairment: a secondary analysis of the INTACT study.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Trial
- Association between breastfeeding and neurodevelopmental outcomes after late preterm birth.Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Human milk microbiome as a modulator of the early-life gut-brain axis: mechanisms and translational opportunities for neurodevelopment.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Breastfeeding support experiences of mothers of preterm infants in China: a qualitative study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Bioactive-Supplemented Infant Formulas and Early Gut-Immune-Endocrine Development: A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Comparison of early growth and development in very preterm children in the Netherlands between the 1980s and 2000s.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Survival, Mortality Predictors, and Morbidity in Extremely Low Birth Weight Neonates: A Retrospective Cohort Study at a Tertiary Hospital in the Eastern Cape, South Africa.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Factors associated with the interruption of exclusive breastfeeding and weaning in premature infants after hospital discharge: a prospective cohort study.Revista latino-americana de enfermagem · 2026Article
- Biological and social determinants of early childhood development assessed with ASQ-3: a Bulgarian nursery-based study.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2026Article
- Harnessing the microbiota-gut-brain axis to prevent and treat pediatric neurodevelopmental disorders: translational insights and strategies.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Review
- Exclusive human milk diet is associated with lower risk of motor function impairment at three years of corrected age.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025Article
- The shifting landscape of the preterm brain.Neuron · 2025Review
- Longitudinal studies on breastfeeding among preterm infants: a scoping review.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Prematurity significantly impacts neonatal health worldwide, necessitating effective interventions to improve outcomes for these vulnerable infants. While breastfeeding has emerged as a cornerstone of preterm care, its precise impact on neurodevelopment remains a subject of ongoing inquiry and debate. This systematic review aims to investigate the existing evidence in this area. Methods: On December 17, 2023, online databases including PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, VIP, CBM, and Wan Fang Data were searched. Comparisons were classified into several categories: never breastfeeding (Never-BF) versus exclusive breastfeeding, Never-BF versus any breastfeeding (Any-BF), predominant preterm formula (Pre-PTF) versus predominant breastfeeding (Pre-BF), and Pre-PTF versus predominant donor breast milk (Pre-DBM) groups. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies were analyzed separately through meta-analyses. Each study's risk of bias was assessed, and the GRADE system was utilized to evaluate the certainty of the findings. Results: Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising one RCT and 15 cohort studies. The key findings indicated that infants in the Any-BF groups demonstrated superior long-term cognitive scores compared to those in the Never-BF groups, particularly evident in infants assessed before 18 months in the Pre-BF groups versus Pre-PTF groups. A reduced risk of neurodevelopmental impairment was also observed in preterm infants in the Any-BF groups. Evidence regarding the effect of breastfeeding on motor development was inconclusive, except for potential motor improvement in extremely low birth weight infants in the Any-BF groups. Neither exclusive breastfeeding nor pre-DBM exhibited clear superiority over Pre-PTF in terms of neurodevelopmental outcomes for preterm infants. Caution is warranted due to potential publication bias impacting the assessment of breastfeeding's impact on motor skills. Conclusion: Our systematic review supports current recommendations for breastfeeding in preterm infants, emphasizing its positive effects on cognitive abilities and reduced risk of neurodevelopmental disorders. Further studies are needed to clarify if DHM provides neurodevelopmental benefits comparable to maternal milk, as current evidence does not sufficiently address this question. Additionally, future investigations should prioritize refining our understanding of the influence of breastfeeding on motor development in this vulnerable population. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO, identifier CRD42023492274, Available at: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023492274.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.