Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39639908›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2024

The environmental health citizen interview tool: towards an inclusive qualitative environmental wellbeing approach in support of planetary health.

Ben Delbaere, Evelise Pereira Barboza, Bianka Plüschke-Altof, Mariia Chebotareva, Evelien Van Rafelghem, Lauren Blockmans, Hans Keune

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ben DelbaereDepartment of Family Medicine and Population Health, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Evelise Pereira BarbozaInstituto Salud Global Barcelona (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain.
Bianka Plüschke-AltofSchool of Economics and Business Administration, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Mariia ChebotarevaSchool of Economics and Business Administration, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Evelien Van RafelghemIDEWE, Leuven, Belgium.
Lauren BlockmansIDEWE, Leuven, Belgium.
Hans KeuneDepartment of Family Medicine and Population Health, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Nature-based Solutions (NbS) are vital for addressing climate change and biodiversity loss, yet their benefits are often unequally distributed. This study introduces the Environmental Health Citizen Interview Tool, aiming to inclusively capture diverse perspectives on environmental wellbeing using qualitative research methods. The principles of epistemic justice and planetary health are central to its development. Methods: The Environmental Health Citizen Interview Tool was developed as a qualitative tool, incorporating a simple visualization scoring system for responses. Six environmental health determinants were selected, with in-depth open-ended follow-up questions. Content validation involved transdisciplinary expert consultation. A guidebook for using the tool was also developed. Findings: The tool offers a comprehensive approach to inquire environmental wellbeing, accommodating diverse perspectives through in-depth inquiries. Limitations include the need for further validation and testing. Interpretation: The Environmental Health Citizen Interview Tool provides a practical framework for inclusive assessment of environmental wellbeing, aligned with planetary health and epistemic justice principles. Its application should be complemented by quantitative environmental monitoring such as air quality and be contextualized by local researchers for reliability and relevance. Future research should focus on refining the tool and exploring its utility in diverse settings to inform equitable local policy interventions.

Indexed as

Environmental HealthInterviews as TopicQualitative ResearchClimate ChangeHumansReproducibility of Resultsdiversity and inclusionenvironmental wellbeingepistemic justicenature based solutionsplanetary healthqualitative assesmenturban green and blue infrastructure

Identifiers

PMID39639908
PMCPMC11618830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.