Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39639891›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in health services2024

Applying health equity implementation science frameworks to population genetic screening.

Nandana D Rao, Stephanie M Fullerton, Brian H Shirts, Annie T Chen, Nora B Henrikson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in health services, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nandana D RaoInstitute for Public Health Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Stephanie M FullertonDepartment of Bioethics & Humanities, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, United States.
Brian H ShirtsInstitute for Public Health Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Annie T ChenDepartment of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Nora B HenriksonKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Research Affiliates Evidence-based Practice Center, Seattle, WA, United States.

Funding

Health care system-led familial risk notification: design and ethical assessmentR01HG010144 · NHGRI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI BLASI, PAULA RAE · 2018 to 2023
$2.1M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG010144
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Implementation science frameworks with a focus on health equity have emerged to help guide the introduction of new interventions into healthcare and community settings while limiting health disparities. The purpose of this research was to explore the applicability of such frameworks to guide the equitable implementation of population genetic screening programs. Methods: We searched PubMed and reference lists for relevant frameworks and examples of their use in health settings. We then assessed if and how selected frameworks provide guidance for different stages of population genetic screening: recruitment, sample collection, result return, follow-up care and long-term management, and cascade screening. Findings were synthesized into a list of health equity considerations specific to each stage. Results: We identified 5 implementation frameworks that focus on health equity. Guidance varied by framework type: determinant (explaining what affects implementation outcomes), process (translating research into practice), or evaluation (assessing implementation). Common characteristics included focusing implementation efforts on populations who have historically experienced health inequities and adapting interventions to fit local contexts. Process models also highlighted the importance of community partnerships. Discussion: Overall, frameworks offered broad recommendations applicable to population genetic screening program implementation. However, gaps still exist in guidance provided for later stages of population genetic screening. To improve the equitable implementation of genetic screening, future programs may benefit from utilizing one or more of these frameworks or by incorporating the health equity considerations and outcomes compiled in this analysis.

Indexed as

genetic testinghealth equityhereditary cancerimplementation sciencepopulation genetic screening

Identifiers

PMID39639891
PMCPMC11617557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.