Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39639882›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical imaging science2024

Complete contrast staining of hepatocellular carcinoma during drug-eluting bead chemoembolization predicts a favorable response.

Sultan R Alharbi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical imaging science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Another year of Service to the Global Radiology Community.Journal of clinical imaging science · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sultan R AlharbiDepartment of Radiology and Medical Imaging, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7369-9869

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate complete contrast staining (CCS) of HCC during drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEBTACE) first session for response prediction. Methods: Forty-one patients with solitary HCC who underwent DEBTACE were retrospectively enrolled and divided into two groups based on contrast staining of HCC using two-dimensional (2D) fluoroscopy during the first session of DEBTACE. Both groups underwent one or two sessions of DEBTACE to achieve a complete response. Responses were evaluated using the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. A comparison of the complete response between the CCS and non-CCS groups was performed, and the prediction value was studied. Results: CCS in 2D fluoroscopy during the first session of drug-eluting bead chemoembolization was observed in 22 (53.7%) patients. Well-defined HCC and super-selective chemoembolization were significantly associated with CCS. Complete response was observed in 54.54%, 90%, and 95.45% of CCS patient groups after the first session, second session, and cumulative sessions of TACE, respectively. Complete responses were 10.52%, 29.41%, and 36.84% in the non-CCS group after the first, second, and cumulative sessions of TACE, respectively. Conclusion: CCS of HCC using 2D fluoroscopy during DEBTACE is a predictor of a favorable response after two sessions of treatment.

Indexed as

ChemoembolizationComplete contrast stainingComplete responseDrug-eluting beadsHepatocellular carcinomaPartial responsePrediction

Identifiers

PMID39639882
PMCPMC11618748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.