Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39639880›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical imaging science2024

Frequency of myocardial infarcts on conventional, non-gated CT: An often-overlooked entity.

Jabi Elijah Shriki, Ashley Elizabeth Prosper, Jerold Shinbane, Patrick M Colletti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical imaging science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Another year of Service to the Global Radiology Community.Journal of clinical imaging science · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jabi Elijah ShrikiDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8615-5246
Ashley Elizabeth ProsperDepartment of Radiology, University of California Los Angeles, California, United States.
Jerold ShinbaneDepartment of Cardiology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States.
Patrick M CollettiDepartment of Cardiology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9625-8046

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study was to determine how often myocardial infarctions are retrospectively visible on conventional, non-gated, non-cardiac computed tomography (CT) scans. Our goal was to evaluate a cohort of patients with myocardial infarctions visible on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to determine how often the area of infarction was retrospectively visible by preceding, conventional CT. We also sought to evaluate how often the diagnosis of myocardial infarction was reported at the time of initial study review. Material and Methods: The Institutional Review Board approval was obtained for the creation and retrospective analysis of a database of patients undergoing cardiac MRI. We started with a cohort of 252 patients who had undergone cardiac MRI at our institution, over a 4-year period. We identified 160 patients who had a myocardial infarct visible on MRI. Results: Of the 160 patients who had been identified as having an infarct on cardiac MRI, 54 patients had undergone a recent (within 30 days) conventional CT scan, usually done for non-cardiac indications. In addition to the review of reports, non-cardiac CT scans were also evaluated retrospectively by two experienced, cardiothoracic imaging physicians, including a radiologist and a cardiologist. In 26 of these patients (48.1%), an infarct was visible on the CT images. In 12 of these 26 cases (46.1%), the infarct was noted in the initial report. In the remaining 14 of these 26 cases (53.8%), the infarct was unrecognized at the time of initial study interpretation. Conclusion: Our retrospective analysis demonstrates that myocardial infarctions may be frequently observed on non-gated, non-cardiac CT scans but may be underrecognized and under-reported.

Indexed as

Conventional computed tomographyIncidental myocardial infarctionMyocardial infarctionNon-gated computed tomography

Identifiers

PMID39639880
PMCPMC11618727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.