ArticleJournal of clinical imaging science2024
Frequency of myocardial infarcts on conventional, non-gated CT: An often-overlooked entity.
Article in Journal of clinical imaging science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Another year of Service to the Global Radiology Community.Journal of clinical imaging science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The objective of this study was to determine how often myocardial infarctions are retrospectively visible on conventional, non-gated, non-cardiac computed tomography (CT) scans. Our goal was to evaluate a cohort of patients with myocardial infarctions visible on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to determine how often the area of infarction was retrospectively visible by preceding, conventional CT. We also sought to evaluate how often the diagnosis of myocardial infarction was reported at the time of initial study review. Material and Methods: The Institutional Review Board approval was obtained for the creation and retrospective analysis of a database of patients undergoing cardiac MRI. We started with a cohort of 252 patients who had undergone cardiac MRI at our institution, over a 4-year period. We identified 160 patients who had a myocardial infarct visible on MRI. Results: Of the 160 patients who had been identified as having an infarct on cardiac MRI, 54 patients had undergone a recent (within 30 days) conventional CT scan, usually done for non-cardiac indications. In addition to the review of reports, non-cardiac CT scans were also evaluated retrospectively by two experienced, cardiothoracic imaging physicians, including a radiologist and a cardiologist. In 26 of these patients (48.1%), an infarct was visible on the CT images. In 12 of these 26 cases (46.1%), the infarct was noted in the initial report. In the remaining 14 of these 26 cases (53.8%), the infarct was unrecognized at the time of initial study interpretation. Conclusion: Our retrospective analysis demonstrates that myocardial infarctions may be frequently observed on non-gated, non-cardiac CT scans but may be underrecognized and under-reported.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.