ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2024
Interplay between Energy and Entropy Mediates Ambimodal Selectivity of Cycloadditions.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One ambimodal transition state can lead to the formation of multiple products. However, it remains fundamentally unknown how the energy and entropy along the post-TS pathways mediate ambimodal selectivity. Here, we investigated the energy and entropy profiles along the post-TS pathways in four [4 + 2]/[6 + 4] cycloadditions. We observe that the pathway leading to the minor product involves a more pronounced entropic trap. These entropic traps, resulting from the conformational change in the dynamic course of ring closure, act as a reservoir of longer-lived dynamic intermediates that roam on the potential energy surface and have a higher likelihood of redistributing to form the other product. The SpnF-catalyzed Diels-Alder reaction produces [4 + 2] and [6 + 4] adducts with nearly equal product distribution and relatively flat energy profiles, in contrast to other cycloadditions. Unexpectedly, the entropy profiles for these two adducts are distinctly different. The formation of the [6 + 4] adduct encounters an entropic barrier acting as a dynamical bottleneck, while the [4 + 2] adduct involves a substantial entropic trap to maintain long-lived intermediates. These opposing effects hinder both product formations and likely cancel each other out so that an equal product distribution is observed.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.