Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39639772›Full record

ReviewBiophysical journal2025

Empirical methods that provide physical descriptions of dynamic cellular processes.

Ian Seim, Stephan W Grill

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biophysical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Polarization as a Process: The Potential of Process Ontology for Understanding Cellular Symmetry Breaking.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Developmental biophysics.Biophysical journal · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ian SeimMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany. Electronic address: seim@mpi-cbg.de.
Stephan W GrillMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany; Center for Systems Biology Dresden (CSBD), Dresden, Germany; Cluster of Excellence Physics of Life, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany. Electronic address: grill@mpi-cbg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We review empirical methods that can be used to provide physical descriptions of dynamic cellular processes during development and disease. Our focus will be nonspatial descriptions and the inference of underlying interaction networks including cell-state lineages, gene regulatory networks, and molecular interactions in living cells. Our overarching questions are: How much can we learn from just observing? To what degree is it possible to infer causal and/or precise mathematical relationships from observations? We restrict ourselves to data sets arising from only observations, or experiments in which minimal perturbations have taken place to facilitate observation of the systems as they naturally occur. We discuss analysis perspectives in order from those offering the least descriptive power but requiring the least assumptions such as statistical associations. We end with those that are most descriptive, but require stricter assumptions and more previous knowledge of the systems such as causal inference and dynamical systems approaches. We hope to provide and encourage the use of a wide array of options for quantitative cell biologists to learn as much as possible from their observations at all stages of understanding of their system of interest. Finally, we provide our own recipe of how to empirically determine quantitative relationships and growth laws from live-cell microscopy data, the resultant predictions of which can then be verified with perturbation experiments. We also include an extended supplement that describes further inference algorithms and theory for the interested reader.

Indexed as

Cell Physiological PhenomenaModels, BiologicalAnimalsHumans

Identifiers

PMID39639772
PMCPMC11947468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.