Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39639771›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2025

Low-side and multitone suppression in the base of the gerbil cochlea.

C Elliott Strimbu, Elizabeth S Olson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

C Elliott StrimbuColumbia University Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, New York, New York. Electronic address: ces2243@cumc.columbia.edu.
Elizabeth S OlsonColumbia University Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, New York, New York; Columbia University Department of Biomedical Engineering, New York, New York.

Funding

Diversity Supplement to Auditory Mechanics and Cochlear AmplificationR01DC015362 · NIDCD · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ELIZABETH S. OLSON · 2016 to 2026
$5.6M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC015362
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cochlea's mechanical response to sound stimulation is nonlinear, likely due to saturation of the mechanoelectric transduction current that is part of an electromechanical feedback loop. The ability of a second tone or tones to reduce the response to a probe tone is one manifestation of nonlinearity, termed suppression. Using optical coherence tomography to measure motion within the organ of Corti, regional motion variations have been observed. Here, we report on the suppression that occurs within the organ of Corti when a high-sound-level, low-frequency suppressor tone was delivered along with a sweep of discreet single tones. Responses were measured in the base of the gerbil cochlea at two best frequency locations, with two different directions of observation relative to the sensory tissue's anatomical axes. Suppression extended over a wide frequency range in the outer hair cell region, whereas it was typically limited to the best frequency peak in the reticular lamina region and at the basilar membrane. Aspects of the observed suppression were consistent with the effect of a saturating nonlinearity. Recent measurements have noted the three-dimensional nature of organ of Corti motion. The effects of suppression observed here could be due to a combination of reduced motion amplitude and altered vibration axis.

Indexed as

CochleaAcoustic StimulationAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaGerbillinae

Identifiers

PMID39639771
PMCPMC11788482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.