ArticleClinical endocrinology2025
Redefining Diagnostic Cut-Offs for the Indirect Water Deprivation Test.
Article in Clinical endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Arginine Vasopressin Deficiency and Oxytocin Deficiency in the Endocrine Clinic.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveAn incorrect diagnosis of arginine vasopressin deficiency and resistance (AVP-D and AVP-R) results in the potentially dangerous use of desmopressin in healthy individuals. The water deprivation test is a central diagnostic test in patients with polydipsia polyuria syndrome (PPS). This study aims to determine the effectiveness of the current interpretation of reference ranges.
methodsThis is a retrospective analysis of 135 patients who underwent a water deprivation test between August 2014 and August 2023. All patient diagnoses were reviewed, and variability and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were determined for serum osmolality, serum sodium and urine osmolality.
resultsSerum sodium demonstrated reduced variability compared with serum osmolality (0.72% vs. 1.16%, respectively, 37.5% reduction; p < 0.001). The standard serum osmolality cut-off value of ≥ 300 mOsm/kg in diagnosing AVP-D, AVP-R, and primary polydipsia (PP) achieved a sensitivity of 76.19% and specificity of 76.92%. A serum sodium cut-off value of ≥ 148 mmol/L demonstrated 100% specificity in excluding PP. This cut-off was used alongside urine osmolality cut-off values of > 630 mOsm/kg (for PP) and < 383 mOsm/kg (for AVP-D/AVP-R). Review of post-desmopressin urine osmolality and clinical monitoring was performed in equivocal diagnostic cases (n = 6), achieving 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity within the study sample.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates that a serum sodium cut-off of ≥ 148 mmol/L in tandem with urine osmolality yields the best diagnostic accuracy to differentiate between AVP-D, AVP-R, and PP. Serum sodium may be more reliable than serum osmolality in the investigation of patients with PPS, demonstrating lower biological and analytical variability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.