Observational studyActa medica academica2024
Family Physicians' Awareness of the Burden of Oral Corticosteroids in Asthma Patients.
Observational study in Acta medica academica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Juglans regiaJournal of tropical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe objective of this study was to identify when family physicians decide to prescribe oral corticosteroids (OCS) to treat asthma, to establish the factors affecting their decision, and how familiar family physicians are with the side effects of OCS. MATERIALS AND
methodsA cross-sectional observational study was conducted among physicians that are members of the Slovenian Family Medicine Society.
resultsThe study included 122 family physicians from all 12 Slovenian regions. The great majority (86.9%) reported they had previously prescribed OCS to asthma patients. The largest share of these (45.1%) tended to prescribe a limited number of tablets, although many (42.6%) also prescribed the entire pack. Regarding the adverse effects associated with OCS, the physicians listed a range of potential problems, highlighting hyperglycemia and exacerbated diabetes, the impact on bone density, a suppressed immune system and increased risk of infection as the most common.
conclusionIn the future, it is vital to improve family physicians' awareness of when OCS may be prescribed to treat severe asthma, and to define the clinical pathway for severe asthma, which should also involve interdisciplinary collaboration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.