ReviewActa medica academica2024
Selenium and Triple Negative Breast Cancer.
Review in Acta medica academica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Impact of Nutritional Supplements and Antioxidants in the Treatment of Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review.Nutrients · 2026Pooled it
- Translational selenium nanoparticles trigger apoptosis in triple-negative breast cancer cells through the MAPKs/Bcl2 pathway.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- Selenium nanoparticles for breast cancer: mechanisms, delivery strategies, and translational challenges.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Therapeutic potential of selenium in breast cancer: targeting apoptosis and proliferation pathways.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Review
- The Role of Integrative Oncology in Patients Affected by Triple Negative Breast Cancer.Current oncology reports · 2025Review
- Micronutrients and skin cancer risk: a Mendelian randomization study.World journal of surgical oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe deadliest, most dangerous subtype of breast cancer is triple-negative, which lacks treatment targets and accounts for 30% of all breast cancer-related deaths worldwide. TNBC is characterized by the expression of no estrogen, progesterone, or human epidermal growth factor 2 receptors. This suggests that new treatment modalities with fewer adverse effects are required.
objectiveThe aim of the present study was to investigate the therapeutic potential of selenium compounds as an adjuvant therapy for Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC), either on their own or in conjunction with nutritional supplements and chemotherapy medications.
methodsUsing the keywords "selenium" and "triple negative breast cancer", a thorough search was conducted in the PubMed database, yielding 23 articles. The following factors were taken into consideration for inclusion: studies using TNBC cell culture lines or in vivo tumors/specimens; full-text articles from the PubMed database; studies published in the English language; experiments with statistically significant results; and selenium used alone or in combination with other antioxidants or chemotherapy. This led to the evaluation of 13 articles in this review.
resultsThe results show that selenium therapy increased the anti-cancer drug's effects and produced tumor cytotoxicity, while reducing the cellular features of the cancer (hyperproliferation, growth, and metastasis). DISCUSSION: This study evaluated the various selenium compounds tested, the cell lines and model organisms used, the assays performed, and the cellular pathways affected.
conclusionExamining the possible benefits of selenium in TNBC treatment highlights the need for more studies to confirm selenium compounds as viable co-therapeutic agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.