Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39639634›Full record

ArticleKorean journal of medical education2024

Medical student needs for e-learning: perspectives of the generation Z.

Kyong-Jee Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Korean journal of medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Kyong-Jee KimDepartment of Medical Education, Dongguk University School of Medicine, Goyang, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo understand medical students' perceptions and needs for e-learning to provide e-learning tailored to the needs of the generation Z students.

methodsA focus group interview was conducted of 30 students in various years of study from five medical schools in South Korea. Subsequently, participants were also surveyed on their perceived importance of and satisfaction with e-learning. Finally, log data from the e-learning portal were analyzed to investigate medical students' actual use of e-learning.

resultsParticipants favored multimedia learning resources and found them useful for studying subjects that could not be easily grasped by reading textbooks alone. Participants preferred video resources, and the most popular resources at the portal were also videos, where the most frequent search or browsing were on those that demonstrated physical examinations and clinical procedures. Participants particularly preferred resources recommended or created by medical faculty as credible sources of information. Participants favored short video clips and preferred them to be segmented into detailed topics. Participants also suggested more detailed categorization of resources for easier access to the contents that are highly relevant to their learning needs.

conclusionThis study highlights the needs for an e-learning environment closely aligned with the practices and preferences of today's students and the importance of medical teachers' role as resource developers. Suggestions for the design and development of e-learning for more convenient browsing and searching of resources highly relevant to student's learning needs are discussed.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, UndergraduateFocus GroupsStudents, MedicalAdultComputer-Assisted InstructionEducation, DistanceFemaleHumansInternetLearningMaleMultimediaRepublic of KoreaSchools, MedicalSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultE-learningGeneration ZMedical educationTeaching and learning

Identifiers

PMID39639634
PMCPMC11625905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.