ArticleJournal of global health2024
Assessing the quality of data for selected reproductive health indicators in designated public health facilities in Bangladesh.
Article in Journal of global health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: An effective health management information system plays a pivotal role in evidence-based decision-making and strengthening health service delivery in a country. The Directorate General of Health Services and the Directorate General of Family Planning of Bangladesh have adopted digital health management information system platforms named district health information system and management information system, respectively. Despite its significance, health management information system data has numerous issues, such as missing values, inaccuracies, lack of internal consistency, and the presence of outliers. This study aims to assess the data quality of reproductive health indicators in the health management information system of the Directorate General of Health Services and the Directorate General of Family Planning. Methods: The study examined two aspects of data quality: a) completeness of data, subdivided into completeness of facility reporting (report submission rate) and completeness of indicator data (presence of missing values); b) internal consistency of reported data, subdivided into presence of outliers, inter-indicator consistency, and consistency between reported data and original records (accuracy rate). The study utilised retrospective monthly data gathered from July 2021 to June 2022, covering 21 reproductive health indicators. Multi-stage cluster sampling was employed to select 112 health facilities for data collection, including 48 facilities from Directorate General of Health Services and 64 from Directorate General of Family Planning, representing various administrative levels across the country. Result: The report submission rate for Directorate General of Health Services facilities was 98%, while for the Directorate General of Family Planning facilities, it was 86%. However, 35% of data points were missing in the district health information system server of Directorate General of Health Services, whereas no missing values were observed in the management information system server of Directorate General of Family Planning. Less than 3% of outliers were detected in the server data of both directorates. Inter-indicator consistency was maintained at a high rate of 98% in health facilities under both directorates. The accuracy of reported data varied across indicators and facility types: Directorate General of Health Services facilities showed accuracy rates ranging between 75 and 92%, with an aggregated rate of 86%. Different tiers of the Directorate General of Family Planning facilities had accuracy rates ranging from 92 to 96%. Conclusion: This research emphasises the significance of rectifying missing values, ensuring consistency, and improving reporting systems, with a particular focus on lower-tier health facilities, to enhance the validity and reliability of reproductive health data in Bangladesh.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.