Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39639458›Full record

ArticleWound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society

The Wound Reporting in Animal and Human Preclinical Studies (WRAHPS) Guidelines.

Nkemcho Ojeh, Nicole M Vecin, Irena Pastar, Susan W Volk, Traci Wilgus, Sarah Griffiths, Allison N Ramey-Ward, Vickie R Driver, Luisa A DiPietro, Lisa J Gould and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Microbiotherapy: an emerging adjunct for burn wound healing.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Transfersomal delivery ofDrug delivery · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. The Wound Reporting in Animal and Human Preclinical Studies (WRAHPS) Guidelines.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Nkemcho OjehWound Healing and Regenerative Medicine Research Program, Dr Phillip Frost Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.
Nicole M VecinWound Healing and Regenerative Medicine Research Program, Dr Phillip Frost Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.
Irena PastarWound Healing and Regenerative Medicine Research Program, Dr Phillip Frost Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0197-6198
Susan W VolkDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Advanced Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Traci WilgusDepartment of Pathology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Sarah GriffithsWound Care Collaborative Community (WCCC), Orlando, Florida, USA.
Allison N Ramey-WardProgenaCare Global, LLC, Marietta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-9502-1531
Vickie R DriverSchool of Medicine, Washington State University, Spokane, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5148-5365
Luisa A DiPietroCenter for Wound Healing and Tissue Regeneration, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Lisa J GouldSouth Shore Hospital Center for Wound Healing, Weymouth, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5167-4679
Marjana Tomic-CanicWound Healing and Regenerative Medicine Research Program, Dr Phillip Frost Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9341-0193

Funding

Prevention of intracellular infection in diabetic wounds by commensal Staphylococcus epidermidisR01DK136241 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Irena Pastar, NATASA STRBO · 2023 to 2026
$2.8M
Developing strategies for effective debridement in patients for venous leg ulcersR01AR073614 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI KIRSNER, ROBERT SCOTT, TOMIC-CANIC, MARJANA · 2018 to 2023
$2.6M
Complexity and the Wound Healing ResponseR35GM139603 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI DIPIETRO, LUISA A · 2021 to 2025
$1.7M
The role of cortisol synthesis in pathogenesis of Hidradenitis suppurativa tunnelsR01AR083385 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Hadar Lev-Tov, Irena Pastar · 2024 to 2026
$1.3M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR073614NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR083385NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK136241NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM139603NIH HHS AR073614NIH HHS DK136241NIH HHS R35 GM139603
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preclinical studies for wound healing disorders are an essential step in translating discoveries into therapies. Also, they are an integral component of initial safety screening and gaining mechanistic insights using an in vivo approach. Given the complexity of the wound healing process, existing guidelines for animal testing do not capture key information due to the inevitable variability in experimental design. Variations in study interpretation are increased by complexities associated with wound aetiology, wounding procedure, multiple treatment conditions, wound assessment, and analysis, as well as lack of acknowledgement of limitation of the model used. Yet, no standards exist to guide reporting crucial experimental information required to interpret results in translational studies of wound healing. Consistency in reporting allows transparency, comparative, and meta-analysis studies and avoids repetition and redundancy. Therefore, there is a critical and unmet need to standardise reporting for preclinical wound studies. To aid in reporting experimental conditions, The Wound Reporting in Animal and Human Preclinical Studies (WRAHPS) Guidelines have now been created by the authors working with the Wound Care Collaborative Community (WCCC) GAPS group to provide a checklist and reporting template for the most frequently used preclinical models in support of development for human clinical trials for wound healing disorders. It is anticipated that the WRAHPS Guidelines will standardise comprehensive methods for reporting in scientific manuscripts and the wound healing field overall. This article is not intended to address regulatory requirements but is intended to provide general guidelines on important scientific considerations for such studies.

Indexed as

Wound HealingAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalGuidelines as TopicHumansResearch DesignWounds and Injurieshuman wound modelspreclinical testingreporting guidelineswound‐healing animal models

Identifiers

PMID39639458
PMCPMC11621255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.