Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39639431›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2025

An eMERGEing definition of patient engagement in genetic counseling.

Jacqueline Fung, Misha Rashkin, Claire Barton, Lizette Grajales, Cheng-Wei Jan, Karlena Lara-Otero, Anjali Narain, Sonia Rios-Ventura, Courtney Rowe-Teeter, Astrid Torres Zapata and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jacqueline FungDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-0669-7788
Misha RashkinStanford Cancer Center, Stanford Health Care, Palo Alto, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5413-3533
Claire BartonDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Lizette GrajalesStanford Cancer Center, Stanford Health Care, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Cheng-Wei JanDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Karlena Lara-OteroStanford Cancer Center, Stanford Health Care, Palo Alto, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4466-6608
Anjali NarainDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Sonia Rios-VenturaDepartment of Medicine - Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Courtney Rowe-TeeterStanford Cancer Center, Stanford Health Care, Palo Alto, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8106-2163
Astrid Torres ZapataDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Brianna TuckerDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.
James M FordDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concept of patient engagement has been widely studied for decades in the fields of medicine, nursing, psychology, social science, public health, and policy, and increased levels of patient engagement have been shown to improve health outcomes and strengthen reported experiences of care. Despite this, little research has been done to evaluate what patient engagement looks like within the context of a genetic counseling session. Additionally, there is limited literature from researchers based in the United States that aims to better understand patient engagement in non-English-speaking populations. This study is part of a larger protocol entitled "Multilingual Education Research in Genetic counseling Engagement (MERGE)," and it explores the elements that make up patient engagement in the context of pre-test genetic counseling for hereditary cancer risk among English- and Spanish-speaking patients. Eligible patients were 18 years or older at the time of their genetic counseling visit, had a personal or family history of breast cancer (if English-speaking) or a personal or family history of any cancer (if Spanish-speaking), and had not previously been seen for hereditary cancer genetic counseling. Out of 40 enrolled participants, 60% of patients (24/40) were English-speaking, while 40% of patients (16/40) were Spanish-speaking. In this study, English transcripts were generated from audio-recordings of clinical, standard-of-care genetic counseling sessions. The transcripts were qualitatively coded by two raters using an inductive approach, allowing for big Q thematic analysis. Six major themes were identified, describing ways in which patients show engagement and participate in decision-making during a pre-test genetic counseling session. All data were analyzed collectively, as assessment of differences between the language groups was not a primary analysis question. From the six themes, a definition of patient engagement in genetic counseling is proposed such that it consists of four "components" that together promote shared decision-making: Application of Education; Expression of Emotions; Feelings of Ownership; and Therapeutic Alliance. This working definition of patient engagement in genetic counseling has overlap with previous research on patient engagement in healthcare and with the Reciprocal-Engagement Model of genetic counseling. Future research on this topic can investigate methods for measuring and improving patient engagement across different settings and service delivery models.

Indexed as

Genetic CounselingPatient ParticipationAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Agedcommunicationdecision‐makingdiversityeducationservice delivery modelsunderrepresented populations

Identifiers

PMID39639431
PMCPMC12041834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.